Current version

Posted February 07, 2018 19:29 · last edited February 07, 2018 19:33

ColeWorld wrote:

Nelfoos wrote:

LeighboNZ wrote:

Nelfoos wrote:

The linesman DID NOT fist pump. 

What was that?

A coincidence? One of the least convincing fist pumps in history? Maybe he was happy his decision was upheld?

You choose, if you're that willing to clutch at straws. He certainly isn't celebrating for the team that received the decision, I'd bet you anything under the sun on that,

 

The fact that you were so adamant and arrogant that there was no fist pump, only to indeed admit there was a fist pump and give a possible reason two posts later, is fudgeing hilarious. Nelfools

Haha, Nelfools! Very witty, you've got me there. I don't think it was a fist pump but I can see why it was interpreted that way. I was just giving him more straws to clutch at, given fist pump is about the least likely excuse I can think of.

Previous versions

1 version
Unknown editor edited February 07, 2018 19:33
ColeWorld wrote:
Nelfoos wrote:
LeighboNZ wrote:
Nelfoos wrote:

The linesman DID NOT fist pump. 

What was that?

A coincidence? One of the least convincing fist pumps in history? Maybe he was happy his decision was upheld?

You choose, if you're that willing to clutch at straws. He certainly isn't celebrating for the team that received the decision, I'd bet you anything under the sun on that,

 

The fact that you were so adamant and arrogant that there was no fist pump, only to indeed admit there was a fist pump and give a possible reason two posts later, is fudgeing hilarious. Nelfools

Haha, Nelfools! You've got me there. I don't think it was a fist pump but I can see why it was interpreted that way. I was just giving him more starws to clutch at, given fist pump is about the least likely excuse I can think of.