You lot must be joking! The Vidic elbow was a clear foul on the GK, can't believe some of the comments on here.
Yes goalies tend to be a protected species which isn't always a good thing, and yes we do just have to hope for refereeing consistency, but that foul was pretty black and white people. To me, Vidic knew what he was doing.
So if you agree with me, why are you not able to believe some of the comments on here? I said goalies are protected and that refs need to be consistent, and I also said if that happened to Edwin I would be upset. No biggy, but I'm a tad confused.
Fair enough... I guess what im getting at is that yes we need refereeing consistency, but in saying that, if the same thing was to occur in the next match and the goal given, i would still not be happy with decision, even though it is consistent with the previous game.
What is worse, inconsistent refereeing or consistently bad refereeing?
its the same thing surely?