or maybe it just shows that through both scenarios the system is flawed? I like the idea of being able to have one or two reviewable desicions like tennis. as long as it does not slow the game dramatically. Otherwise, it will always be the same! I don't mind seeing gaffers go mad every once in a while though. They certainly should be able to express their dissapointment though. And also, ask for the refs game to be scrutinized if they believe there were any serious blunders in the match.
Current version
Posted November 18, 2008 22:50 · last edited March 18, 2021 07:50
or maybe it just shows that through both scenarios the system is flawed? I like the idea of being able to have one or two reviewable desicions like tennis. as long as it does not slow the game dramatically. Otherwise, it will always be the same! I don't mind seeing gaffers go mad every once in a while though. They certainly should be able to express their dissapointment though. And also, ask for the refs game to be scrutinized if they believe there were any serious blunders in the match.