Post history

History for 20 Legend

Manchester United (Part 2)

Back to topic

Current version

Posted January 30, 2019 07:20 · last edited March 18, 2021 07:50

ClubOranje wrote:
Downey26 wrote:
20 Legend wrote:

Great to see them claw the result back.

Rashford should have scored but that happens occasionally. Don't make a habit of it.

Every game I watch with John Moss (non United games included) he's just a useless prick. Always lets little teams man handle players. Pisses me right off. Last 5 minutes of stoppage time Burnley killed a solid 3 minutes, and he blew it up exactly on 95:00.

Of note is that comebacks happen without the battering ram, who I see has offers from China.

Shouldn't he have played an extra minute for the goal scored?

No.

You don't add minutes because goals are scored.

The usual interpretation is that goals and substitutions should add an extra 30 seconds of play.

Even so, not only was there a goal between 90' - 95', there was also a substitution and a Burnley goal kick which took a whole minute.

Calling it on 95' on the dot was wrong.

Here's a BBC article which basically backs up what I just said - https://www.bbc.com/sport/football/20159223

Previous versions

4 versions
Unknown editor edited March 18, 2021 07:50
ClubOranje wrote:
Downey26 wrote:
20 Legend wrote:

Great to see them claw the result back.

Rashford should have scored but that happens occasionally. Don't make a habit of it.

Every game I watch with John Moss (non United games included) he's just a useless prick. Always lets little teams man handle players. Pisses me right off. Last 5 minutes of stoppage time Burnley killed a solid 3 minutes, and he blew it up exactly on 95:00.

Of note is that comebacks happen without the battering ram, who I see has offers from China.

Shouldn't he have played an extra minute for the goal scored?

No.

You don't add minutes because goals are scored.

The usual interpretation is that goals and substitutions should add an extra 30 seconds of play.

Even so, not only was there a goal between 90' - 95', there was also a substitution and a Burnley goal kick which took a whole minute.

Calling it on 95' on the dot was wrong.

Here's a BBC article which basically backs up what I just said - https://www.bbc.com/sport/football/20159223

Unknown editor edited January 30, 2019 07:22
ClubOranje wrote:
Downey26 wrote:
20 Legend wrote:

Great to see them claw the result back.

Rashford should have scored but that happens occasionally. Don't make a habit of it.

Every game I watch with John Moss (non United games included) he's just a useless prick. Always lets little teams man handle players. Pisses me right off. Last 5 minutes of stoppage time Burnley killed a solid 3 minutes, and he blew it up exactly on 95:00.

Of note is that comebacks happen without the battering ram, who I see has offers from China.

Shouldn't he have played an extra minute for the goal scored?

No.

You don't add minutes because goals are scored.

That's incorrect. The usual interpretation is that goals and substitutions should add an extra 30 seconds of play.

Even so, not only was there a goal between 90' - 95', there was also a substitution and a Burnley goal kick which took a whole minute.

Calling it on 95' on the dot was wrong.

Unknown editor edited January 30, 2019 07:21
ClubOranje wrote:
Downey26 wrote:
20 Legend wrote:

Great to see them claw the result back.

Rashford should have scored but that happens occasionally. Don't make a habit of it.

Every game I watch with John Moss (non United games included) he's just a useless prick. Always lets little teams man handle players. Pisses me right off. Last 5 minutes of stoppage time Burnley killed a solid 3 minutes, and he blew it up exactly on 95:00.

Of note is that comebacks happen without the battering ram, who I see has offers from China.

Shouldn't he have played an extra minute for the goal scored?

No.

You don't add minutes because goals are scored.

That's incorrect. The usual interpretation is that goals and substitutions should add an extra 30 seconds of play.

So, not only was there a goal between 90' - 95', there was also a substitution and a Burnley goal kick which took a whole minute.

Calling it on 95' on the dot was wrong.

Unknown editor edited January 30, 2019 07:20
ClubOranje wrote:
Downey26 wrote:
20 Legend wrote:

Great to see them claw the result back.

Rashford should have scored but that happens occasionally. Don't make a habit of it.

Every game I watch with John Moss (non United games included) he's just a useless prick. Always lets little teams man handle players. Pisses me right off. Last 5 minutes of stoppage time Burnley killed a solid 3 minutes, and he blew it up exactly on 95:00.

Of note is that comebacks happen without the battering ram, who I see has offers from China.

Shouldn't he have played an extra minute for the goal scored?

No.

You don't add minutes because goals are scored.

That's incorrect. The usual interpretation is that goals and substitutions should add an extra 30 seconds of play.

So, not only was there a goal between 90' - 95', there was also a substitution and a goal Burnley goal kick which took a whole minute.

Calling it on 95' on the dot was wrong.