Post history

History for paulm

Manchester United (Part 2)

Back to topic

Current version

Posted February 13, 2019 23:31 · last edited March 18, 2021 07:50

Nelfoos wrote:
paulm wrote:
Nelfoos wrote:
paulm wrote:

You have "this'd" posts throughout the period, and made the odd comment not related to Mourinho, Solskjaer or the individual matches (until this morning, the first loss). So you have been on here consistently, despite now implying otherwise.

For some reason you just choose not to comment on good performances, or anything that seems to be contrary to your opinion. That's all I was pointing out. 

No I'm not a councillor (or a counsellor), but even though you and I generally do not get along, it does concern me that you are so focussed on negative things a lot of the time. 

Dude, you're overstepping a mile here. Let people comment what they want to comment and if he doesn't want to comment after some games that's none of your business. Or mine, for that matter.

I never told him what to comment, I made observations about the comments he makes. It's not up to me to "let" people comment. 

I'm a big believer of free speech, you can say anything you blimmin well like. 

You however are most definitely implying that I shouldn't have made my comment, which is rather ironic, given your message. 

"Let people comment what they want to comment" includes me. I will say what I like, within the forum rules, thank you very much.

 

You're welcome to comment whatever you want, I'm just pointing out that your comment comes cross incredibly judgemental and asshole-y. As does this follow up. So, yes, I'm implying a decent, polite human being wouldn't have made that comment and therefore that you shouldn't (obviously making assumptions here that may be incorrect). Everyone is entitled to voice their opinion but "free speech" isn't a free license to say what you want without being called out for being a Twit.

How about I just say what I want, you cry about it, and we're all exercising our free speech.

Have a nice day. 

Previous versions

1 version
Unknown editor edited March 18, 2021 07:50
Nelfoos wrote:
paulm wrote:
Nelfoos wrote:
paulm wrote:

You have "this'd" posts throughout the period, and made the odd comment not related to Mourinho, Solskjaer or the individual matches (until this morning, the first loss). So you have been on here consistently, despite now implying otherwise.

For some reason you just choose not to comment on good performances, or anything that seems to be contrary to your opinion. That's all I was pointing out. 

No I'm not a councillor (or a counsellor), but even though you and I generally do not get along, it does concern me that you are so focussed on negative things a lot of the time. 

Dude, you're overstepping a mile here. Let people comment what they want to comment and if he doesn't want to comment after some games that's none of your business. Or mine, for that matter.

I never told him what to comment, I made observations about the comments he makes. It's not up to me to "let" people comment. 

I'm a big believer of free speech, you can say anything you blimmin well like. 

You however are most definitely implying that I shouldn't have made my comment, which is rather ironic, given your message. 

"Let people comment what they want to comment" includes me. I will say what I like, within the forum rules, thank you very much.

 

You're welcome to comment whatever you want, I'm just pointing out that your comment comes cross incredibly judgemental and asshole-y. As does this follow up. So, yes, I'm implying a decent, polite human being wouldn't have made that comment and therefore that you shouldn't (obviously making assumptions here that may be incorrect). Everyone is entitled to voice their opinion but "free speech" isn't a free license to say what you want without being called out for being a Twit.

How about I just say what I want, you cry about it, and we're all exercising our free speech.

Have a nice day.