Post history

History for foal30

Rangers - demotion.

Back to topic

Current version

Posted September 18, 2013 07:27 · last edited September 18, 2013 07:29

dairyflat wrote:

As you say but a good read none the less. 


Loving the comments.



the comments highlight the problem that a "good article" is invariably  one the most lines up with our predetermined position on the matter.

Somewhat remarkably there is people who believe Rangers were hard done by, and another group who think despite the years of systematic cheating it should be pardoned for the good of the game...

Previous versions

3 versions
foal30 edited September 18, 2013 07:29
dairyflat wrote:

As you say but a good read none the less. 


Loving the comments.



the comments highlight the problem that a "good article" is invariably  one the most lines up with our predetermined position on the matter.

Somewhat remarkably there is people who believe Rangers were hard done by, and another group who think despite the years of systematic cheating it should be pardoned for the good of the game...
foal30 edited September 18, 2013 07:29
dairyflat wrote:

As you say but a good read none the less. 


Loving the comments.



the comments highlight the problem that a "good article" is invariably  one the most lines up with our predetermined position on the matter.

Somewhat remarkably there is people who belive Rangers were hard done by, and another group who think despite the years of systamatic cheating it should be pardoned for the good of the game...
foal30 edited September 18, 2013 07:28
dairyflat wrote:

As you say but a good read none the less. 


Loving the comments.



the comments highlight the problem that a "good article" is invariably  one the most lines up with our predetermined position on the matter.

Somewhat remarkably there is people who beleive Rangers were hard done by, and another group who think despite the years of systamatic cheating it should be pardoned for the good of the game...