Post history

History for Nelfoos

Anthony Hudson (FAT Technical Director | Thailand)

Back to topic

Current version

Posted April 23, 2017 00:59 · last edited April 23, 2017 01:01

patrick478 wrote:

paulm wrote:

Good article that. 

I disagree wholeheartedly. It's a Hudson wankfest, Burgess has just run with the lines NZF has fed him.

I thought Burgess was better than that, but apparently not.

Yeah screw that guy for publishing direct quotes. He's posted a factual article, just because it favours one party doesn't make it bad.

Not every sports piece has to be investigative journalism and there's nothing wrong with a story reported from the point of view of one of the parties. Feel free to write one yourself on the other side of the spectrum.

You only have an issue with this because you dislike Hudson already, there's nothing wrong with that article at all.

Previous versions

3 versions
Unknown editor edited April 23, 2017 01:01
patrick478 wrote:
paulm wrote:

Good article that. 

I disagree wholeheartedly. It's a Hudson wankfest, Burgess has just run with the lines NZF has fed him.

I thought Burgess was better than that, but apparently not.

Yeah screw that guy for publishing direct quotes. He's posted a factual article, just because it favours one party doesn't make it bad.

Not every journalism piece has to be investigative journalism and there's nothing wrong with a story reported from the point of view of one of the parties. Feel free to write one yourself on the other side of the spectrum.

You only have an issue with this because you dislike Hudson already, there's nothing wrong with that article at all.

Unknown editor edited April 23, 2017 01:01
patrick478 wrote:
paulm wrote:

Good article that. 

I disagree wholeheartedly. It's a Hudson wankfest, Burgess has just run with the lines NZF has fed him.

I thought Burgess was better than that, but apparently not.

Yeah screw that guy for publishing direct quotes.

Not every journalism piece has to be investigative journalism and there's nothing wrong with a story reported from the point of view of one of the parties. Feel free to write one yourself on the other side of the spectrum.

You only have an issue with this because you dislike Hudson already, there's nothing wrong with that article at all.

Unknown editor edited April 23, 2017 00:59
patrick478 wrote:
paulm wrote:

Good article that. 

I disagree wholeheartedly. It's a Hudson wankfest, Burgess has just run with the lines NZF has fed him.

I thought Burgess was better than that, but apparently not.

Yeah screw that guy for publishing direct quotes.

Not every journalism piece has to be investigative journalism and there's nothing wrong with a story reported from the point of view of one of the parties. Feel free to write one yourself on the other side of the spectrum.

YOu only have an issue with this because you dislike Hudson already, there's nothing wrong with that article at all.