Post history

History for Nelfoos

Anthony Hudson (FAT Technical Director | Thailand)

Back to topic

Current version

Posted April 23, 2017 01:15 · last edited April 23, 2017 01:19

inafoxhole wrote:

Nelfoos wrote:

patrick478 wrote:

paulm wrote:

Good article that. 

I disagree wholeheartedly. It's a Hudson wankfest, Burgess has just run with the lines NZF has fed him.

I thought Burgess was better than that, but apparently not.

Yeah screw that guy for publishing direct quotes. He's posted a factual article, just because it favours one party doesn't make it bad.

Not every sports piece has to be investigative journalism and there's nothing wrong with a story reported from the point of view of one of the parties. Feel free to write one yourself on the other side of the spectrum.

You only have an issue with this because you dislike Hudson already, there's nothing wrong with that article at all.

There is no news value in it. He has a checklist? So does my mum when she goes shopping.

I disagree. Meeting with All Blacks' and Crusaders' coaching staff is interesting to me, it provides further information about Confeds Cup fixtures that readers may otherwise not have known, and at the very least it serves to show that he's competent in his job - something a lot on here don't seem to agree with (contrary to the opinions of the players in the actual squad).

Sure there's a pro-Hudson slant, but every article has an agenda so I don't see why this one is worth getting your knickers in a twist over.

Previous versions

4 versions
Unknown editor edited April 23, 2017 01:19
inafoxhole wrote:
Nelfoos wrote:
patrick478 wrote:
paulm wrote:

Good article that. 

I disagree wholeheartedly. It's a Hudson wankfest, Burgess has just run with the lines NZF has fed him.

I thought Burgess was better than that, but apparently not.

Yeah screw that guy for publishing direct quotes. He's posted a factual article, just because it favours one party doesn't make it bad.

Not every sports piece has to be investigative journalism and there's nothing wrong with a story reported from the point of view of one of the parties. Feel free to write one yourself on the other side of the spectrum.

You only have an issue with this because you dislike Hudson already, there's nothing wrong with that article at all.

There is no news value in it. He has a checklist? So does my mum when she goes shopping.

I disagree. Meeting with All Black's and Crusader's coaching staff is interesting to me, it provides further information about Confeds Cup fixtures that readers may otherwise not have known, and at the very least it serves to show that he's competent in his job - something a lot on here don't seem to agree with (contrary to the opinions of the players in the actual squad).

Sure there's a pro-Hudson slant, but every article has an agenda so I don't see why this one is worth getting your knickers in a twist over.

Unknown editor edited April 23, 2017 01:16
inafoxhole wrote:
Nelfoos wrote:
patrick478 wrote:
paulm wrote:

Good article that. 

I disagree wholeheartedly. It's a Hudson wankfest, Burgess has just run with the lines NZF has fed him.

I thought Burgess was better than that, but apparently not.

Yeah screw that guy for publishing direct quotes. He's posted a factual article, just because it favours one party doesn't make it bad.

Not every sports piece has to be investigative journalism and there's nothing wrong with a story reported from the point of view of one of the parties. Feel free to write one yourself on the other side of the spectrum.

You only have an issue with this because you dislike Hudson already, there's nothing wrong with that article at all.

There is no news value in it. He has a checklist? So does my mum when she goes shopping.

I disagree. Meeting with All Black's and Crusader's coaching staff is interesting to me, it provides further information about Confeds Cup fixtures that readers may otherwise not have known, and at the very least it serves to show that he's competent in his job - something a lot on here do't seem to agree with (contrary to the opinions of the players in the actual squad).

Sure there's a pro-Hudson slant, but every article has an agenda so I don't see why this one is worth getting your knickers in a twist over.

Unknown editor edited April 23, 2017 01:16
inafoxhole wrote:
Nelfoos wrote:
patrick478 wrote:
paulm wrote:

Good article that. 

I disagree wholeheartedly. It's a Hudson wankfest, Burgess has just run with the lines NZF has fed him.

I thought Burgess was better than that, but apparently not.

Yeah screw that guy for publishing direct quotes. He's posted a factual article, just because it favours one party doesn't make it bad.

Not every sports piece has to be investigative journalism and there's nothing wrong with a story reported from the point of view of one of the parties. Feel free to write one yourself on the other side of the spectrum.

You only have an issue with this because you dislike Hudson already, there's nothing wrong with that article at all.

There is no news value in it. He has a checklist? So does my mum when she goes shopping.

I disagree. Meeting with All Black's and Crusader's coaching staff is interesting to me, it provides further information about Confeds Cup fixtures that readers may otherwise not have known, and at the very least it serves to show that he's competent in his job - something a lot on here do't seem to agree with (contrary to the opinions of the players in the actual squad).

Sure there's a pro-Hudson slant, but every article has an agenda.

Unknown editor edited April 23, 2017 01:16
inafoxhole wrote:
Nelfoos wrote:
patrick478 wrote:
paulm wrote:

Good article that. 

I disagree wholeheartedly. It's a Hudson wankfest, Burgess has just run with the lines NZF has fed him.

I thought Burgess was better than that, but apparently not.

Yeah screw that guy for publishing direct quotes. He's posted a factual article, just because it favours one party doesn't make it bad.

Not every sports piece has to be investigative journalism and there's nothing wrong with a story reported from the point of view of one of the parties. Feel free to write one yourself on the other side of the spectrum.

You only have an issue with this because you dislike Hudson already, there's nothing wrong with that article at all.

There is no news value in it. He has a checklist? So does my mum when she goes shopping.

I disagree. Meeting with All Black's and Crusaders coaching staff is interesting to me, it provides further information about Confeds Cup fixtures that readers may otherwise not have known, and at the very least it serves to show that he's competent in his job - something a lot on here do't seem to agree with (contrary to the opinions of the players in the actual squad).