Choose unwatchable football
Choose bizarre selections
Choose embarrassing results in Oceania
Choose even worse results outside
Choose a losing record
Choose double standards
Choose polishing your own record
Choose PR
Choose Moses Dyer
Choose BMI
Choose Dane Ingham then don't
Choose Dane Ingham
Choose Hudson
...but it's okay because the players enjoy being in camp.
Choose unwatchable football - your opinion I guess. I've had no issue with it.
Choose bizarre selections - which have had the overall effect of strengthening NZ football. Not all of them have worked out (which is to be expected), but good on him. I can't fault a new coach with no history in the region for exploring his options. He has also admitted he went too far with his initial selection policies above and apologised to the team as a whole for it.
Choose embarrassing results in Oceania - We've won what we needed to
Choose even worse results outside - Maybe initially, but recent times have been better
Choose a losing record - So would any other manager
Choose double standards - You'll have to elaborate
Choose polishing your own record - Plenty of people lie on their CV
Choose PR - Would you rather he had no PR? What a dumb comment
Choose Moses Dyer - I can't defend this one
Choose BMI - Good decision from Hudson
Choose Dane Ingham then don't - Good decision from Hudson
Choose Dane Ingham - Good decision from Hudson
Choose Hudson - I will
...but it's okay because the players enjoy being in camp - Well the comment was more to the effect of "This regime far outstrips anything Herbert or Merrick have done and the standard of football and professionalism have increased out of sight", but you twist it however you want if you need to marginalise it.
Hudson's reign has been far, far from perfect and I wouldn't even class myself as a fan of him as NZ coach. I just think the criticism here is often completely unfair and out of context.
Way to live up to your username as well!