Exhibit A:
Pim's unforgivable, indefensible chaos
Kevin Airs (Friend of the Fever)
Jun 14 2010 19:49
Comment now
My dad wasn't a big one for giving advice, and it always basically
boiled down to "...do your best and don't do anything stupid."
If only Pim's dad had given him the same advice.
This morning's performance was unforgivable. Worse still, it was
indefensible. Pim's masterplan was just ludicrous, flawed in almost
every area...and almost anyone could have predicted the outcome.
After two years of playing a 4-2-3-1 for almost every second of every
match, Verbeek suddenly chose to switch to a 4-4-2 literally 30 minutes
before the start of the World Cup.
For that last half-hour of the USA final pre-tournament warm-up game, we
suddenly looked like the dangerous attacking side Pim's critics had
demanded...but already it was too late.
Scott McDonald, a prolific striker in his club's 4-4-2 formation, had
already been sent home after failing miserably to slot into stubborn
Pim's rigid 4-2-3-1 - and yet suddenly we were playing 4-4-2.
However, it still looked like it was merely an experiment to use in
desperation if we ever went behind.
And then came the Tweet from South Africa...
Five hours before the game against Germany was due to kick off,
FourFourTwo publisher Andy Jackson - our #wcinsider in South Africa -
exclusively tweeted the starting line-up on our @fourfourtwooz Twitter
account...and that we were playing a 4-4-2 with Garcia and Cahill
upfront.
Kennedy, Kewell and Bresciano were all being left on the bench. It all
seemed too unlikely to be true - and yet that's exactly what happened.
Now, granted, Pim needed to do something to spring a surprise at this
World Cup. Our tactics were far too rigid and predictable (strong
defence, diagonal ball from the wing, Kennedy/Cahill to try to knock it
home...)
But this? This smacked of unplanned desperation, of grasping at straws.
If this was a considered masterplan, we should have kept Scotty Mac in
the side - that really would have been a shock to see him come out
alongside Kennedy and play 4-4-2.
But instead we had Garcia and Cahill pretending to be strikers (but in
reality it was 4-6-0).
Worse though was what we did in defence. We proved in the USA game (if
we didn't already know for sure) that our ageing, one paced sluggish
defence was no match for a mobile attack.
And yet still we played a ridiculous high line offside trap that failed
time after time after time. Lucas Neill spent more time appealling
(wrongly and in vain) for offside than anything else.
If ever the appalling pace of our backline was exposed it was was when
Ozil gave Neill - probably our fastest defender - a head start ... and
still left him for dead.
Meanwhile Moore's leaden pace can now only be measured in geological
terms.
It was obvious after a matter of minutes that the trap was not working,
yet not only did we persist in it, we moved it higher and higher until
we got an offside decision (almost the only one we got in 90 minutes)
literally just inside our own half and no more...
Pim's stubborness extended to forcing players into his new chosen
formation regardless of their ability or experience in the
role...meaning Culina was bizarrely running the wing.
After the Roos were two down, Verbeek realised it just wasn't working
and reverted to the more familiar 4-2-3-1 with the introduction of
Holman in the second half.
But by that time, it was all too late. Germany sat back and soaked up
the light Aussie pressure until Cahill's harsh dismissal opened the
floodgates.
We were thrashed and humiliated. It wasn't the players' fault. It was
entirely Pim's. If ever there was a game to stick to the 4-5-1
formation, it was this one. Strong defence and the chance of a counter
if we're lucky.
But no, Pim chose to experiment...after literally years of stubborn
reluctance to any sort of change. The result was an entirely predictable
debacle.
Pim had won me over despite my initial doubts with his efficient
approach that got us to the World and Asian Cups.
But through it all, there was the constant underlying issue with our
inability to take control of games and command them (not necessarily win
5-0, just impose ourselves) and the over-reliance on simple luck.
There was also the rigid structure to his formations that were never
varied against strong or weak opposition, and his steadfast refusal to
work around the strengths of his potentially best players, instead
making them fit into his formation - or go home.
He also completely ignored other defensive options to bring a player out
of international retirement despite not having a club and lacking match
practice.
This is not the benefit of hindsight. These were concerns repeatedly
aired long before the game this morning.
No-one really expected us to win today. A draw would have been great,
but a 2-0 or 3-0 loss was always on the cards.
But for the match to unwind in tactical chaos like that was unforgivable
and has left an indelible stain on not only Verbeek's record and
reputation, but Australia's too.
It was sheer madness. He let the Socceroos down and he let the Socceroo
fans down. What's more, I really hope he phoned Scott McDonald at some
point to apologise...again.
It was a humiliating gamble that disgraced the country and the players.
We all deserve an apology but to be honest, it will make no difference.
The damage has been done, and I don't think we now have the players
available - through selection, injury or suspension - to redeem
ourselves in the next two games.
Prove me wrong, Pim. Please.
But this time, don't do anything stupid.
* Vinnie Grella said we shouldn't worry as no-one died and it was just a
game of football. It's an interesting perspective from a professional
player talking about his country's performance at the World Cup.
All I know is that if I ever told my colleagues not to worry about us
doing a poor job on here as it's "only a website", that would be the day
I should really jack this job in...