92nd minute DRAMA... not the keepers finest moment 🫣 pic.twitter.com/KQLNtZQbpy
— Sky Sports (@SkySports) January 28, 2026
🚩 | KRC Genk Ladies mag de cornervlag bedanken! 😅🍀 #GNKSTA pic.twitter.com/aw4bEb1Inm
— DAZN België (@DAZN_BENL) January 31, 2026
Truly bizarre moment where a sideline Chesterfield player about to be subbed on, cops a yellow for kicking the ball away from a Harrogate player seeking to take a quick throw.
Unbelievable 😂 pic.twitter.com/PRItnYB6BA
— The 30 ⚽️🏴 (@The_Thirty_) February 20, 2026
Guys.
— Seth (@SethMan31) March 29, 2026
Oakland Roots goalkeeper Raphael Spiegel was shown a red card after throwing a ball on the field during a breakaway.
It truly is the beautiful game. pic.twitter.com/UovEarQY7u
RR wrote:
https://x.com/SethMan31/status/2038074838615511180
Guys.
Oakland Roots goalkeeper Raphael Spiegel was shown a red card after throwing a ball on the field during a breakaway.
It truly is the beautiful game. pic.twitter.com/UovEarQY7u
— Seth (@SethMan31) March 29, 2026
A red? This fellow only got a yellow
Ramming liberal dribble down your throat since 2009
This forum needs less angst and more Kate Bush threads
I've seen enough: this is the greatest goal in MLS history.
— Ben Wright (@benwright) April 4, 2026
(Also one of the most chaotically entertaining games in MLS history)pic.twitter.com/WzA8l5ecxj
3 red cards in that game!
Queenslander 3x a year.
Puskás Award 2026. pic.twitter.com/9uWY43Vu8T
— Bristol City FC (@BristolCity) April 3, 2026
Queenslander 3x a year.
If you don’t laugh, you’ll cry.. this sums up our season #lcfc pic.twitter.com/OLvzNSRIsf
— Lcfc.Zoone (@lcfczoone_) April 11, 2026
⚽️Franco Fragueda le atajó el penal a Sebas Ferreira, pero en el despeje de Chapa Martínez... 😅¡¡¡LE REBOTÓ POR LA CARA!!!😅
— Tigo Sports (@TigoSportsPY) April 12, 2026
📺Tigo Sports+
▶️Viví el #AperturaAPF2026 por https://t.co/pGNhXoLRh7 pic.twitter.com/YTd0Xzc0eX
Diego Luna, that was wild 😱
— Major League Soccer (@MLS) April 19, 2026
📺 Apple TV: https://t.co/qtmtgJxfmQ pic.twitter.com/1qd7Qblbi9
https://youtube.com/shorts/13cPQ96FaRY?si=Oi-BJ2gpzecCzuHG
🚨🚨| MEAN WHILE IN TANZANIA, A PUSKAS WORTHY GOAL WAS SCORED. ⚽️🔥pic.twitter.com/sKW9gskug1
— Goals Side (@goalsside) May 4, 2026
⚠️ STOP EVRYTHING AND WATCH THIS
— Alex Scout (@AlexScoutRo) May 7, 2026
💥 Alin Techeres 🇷🇴 (LB, 2007, Sepsi/U Cluj) scored the goal of the year in Romania and a potential Puskas Award contender. pic.twitter.com/4iLSepPxYF
https://x.com/ChicagoFire/status/2080081054602289382
What on earth? In Venezuela's second tier.
https://x.com/EnXogoG/status/2083598373446148599
eeek and a red card!
Queenslander 3x a year.
theprof wrote:
Goalkeeper confused by pitch markings in embarrassing blunder
eeek and a red card!
why the red card? was not a dogso.
Bullion wrote:theprof wrote:
Goalkeeper confused by pitch markings in embarrassing blunder
eeek and a red card!
why the red card? was not a dogso.
Queenslander 3x a year.
Bullion wrote:theprof wrote:
Goalkeeper confused by pitch markings in embarrassing blunder
eeek and a red card!
why the red card? was not a dogso.
Valley FC til I die?
Nelfoos wrote:Bullion wrote:Definitely DOGSO, the attacker is right there and would be next to the ball with an open goal if the keeper doesnt handle it.theprof wrote:
Goalkeeper confused by pitch markings in embarrassing blunder
eeek and a red card!
why the red card? was not a dogso.
reubee wrote:Nelfoos wrote:... but the keeper could reasonably have played it legally, I would've thought not DOGSO so yellow.Bullion wrote:Definitely DOGSO, the attacker is right there and would be next to the ball with an open goal if the keeper doesnt handle it.theprof wrote:
Goalkeeper confused by pitch markings in embarrassing blunder
eeek and a red card!
why the red card? was not a dogso.
Valley FC til I die?
Nelfoos wrote:Bullion wrote:Definitely DOGSO, the attacker is right there and would be next to the ball with an open goal if the keeper doesnt handle it.theprof wrote:
Goalkeeper confused by pitch markings in embarrassing blunder
eeek and a red card!
why the red card? was not a dogso.
Bullion wrote:Nelfoos wrote:The defender is right there and was basically positioned between the attacker and keeper, just moved out of the way to not clash with the keeper right at the end. It wasn't a goal scoring opportunity at all imho.Bullion wrote:Definitely DOGSO, the attacker is right there and would be next to the ball with an open goal if the keeper doesnt handle it.theprof wrote:
Goalkeeper confused by pitch markings in embarrassing blunder
eeek and a red card!
why the red card? was not a dogso.
Its textbook DOGSO and I'd be surprised if any ref worth their salt disagreed.
Valley FC til I die?
Nelfoos wrote:Bullion wrote:The defender has stopped and the attacker would be comfortably the next to the ball with an open goal. Normally when you consider if a chance is DOGSO the keeper is in the net, but with him removing himself from consideration by handling the ball the chance becomes a lot, lot better. The attacker probably shoots within 1 or 2 touches before the defender gets near him with the momentum difference and can simply pass it into the empty net.Nelfoos wrote:The defender is right there and was basically positioned between the attacker and keeper, just moved out of the way to not clash with the keeper right at the end. It wasn't a goal scoring opportunity at all imho.Bullion wrote:Definitely DOGSO, the attacker is right there and would be next to the ball with an open goal if the keeper doesnt handle it.theprof wrote:
Goalkeeper confused by pitch markings in embarrassing blunder
eeek and a red card!
why the red card? was not a dogso.
Its textbook DOGSO and I'd be surprised if any ref worth their salt disagreed.
https://www.instagram.com/reel/DblaM17oRgY/?igsh=eHlwcnRhaHM2Mzlx
Valley FC til I die?
Nelfoos wrote:
Youre welcome to disagree, but it just shows ignorance of the LOTG. I've seen a couple of refs other than myself touch on this one and the agreement on red card is unanimous.
Eghttps://www.instagram.com/reel/DblaM17oRgY/?igsh=eHlwcnRhaHM2MzlxOnce the keeper has handled the ball he is out of the play for DOGSO consideration, the circumstances he handled the ball under are completely irrelevant. The distance, direction, likelihood of control considerations are all met with no possibility for disagreement, the attacker is very obviously going to be the next player to touch the ball once the keeper is removed from play. There is 1 defender nearby but, for the reasons I explained above, that isnt enough to make it not DOGSO.


