Marquee
8.3K
·
5.3K
·
about 10 years

If and when it does go through, then very well done to Woodsy.

Hoping with a bit more experience and a couple of solid seasons behind him over the past couple of years will stand him in good stead for the Premier League. A good team to suit his style of play as well I'd suggest - well coached, disciplined and have more of a direct style of play, which should be right up his alley. A step up in intensity and quality can only bode well for NZF and the All Whites in general. Good stuff.

WeeNix
300
·
570
·
almost 11 years

I wonder if any Leeds United supporters will still be wearing their shirts at the All Whites games, I swear the game against Fiji there were just as many as there were fans wearing official All Whites shirts.

Starting XI
520
·
4.1K
·
over 14 years
He just tweeted he not playing today as in talks with Prem club
Marquee
8.3K
·
5.3K
·
about 10 years

detoxin wrote:
He just tweeted he not playing today as in talks with Prem club

And some cracking comments from some upset Leeds supporters to accompany it.

RR
·
Bossi Insider
11K
·
35K
·
about 16 years

YoungHeart wrote:

detoxin wrote:
He just tweeted he not playing today as in talks with Prem club

And some cracking comments from some upset Leeds supporters to accompany it.

Does come off as a bit of a dick move, trying to force the move. If the club was wanting to sell him, they just wouldn't select him.
Obsessed
45
·
140
·
over 7 years

Great to have a second kiwi in the premiership

Hope he finds the net early and keeps them up

Starting XI
460
·
2.3K
·
over 17 years
Can't say that Burnley fans are too chuffed with this move (assuming he passes the medical). Not really what we need (and seems overpriced). No guarantee that he will start regularly. That said, naturally hope he does well. And he will learn well under Dyche, who seems to be able to get the best out of players.
Legend
13K
·
25K
·
over 9 years

https://www.stuff.co.nz/sport/football/world-game/95955084/chris-wood-deserves-his-move-to-burnley-but-now-the-hard-work-starts-again

Legend
2.7K
·
17K
·
over 17 years

Not good enough for the Premier League.

Marquee
7.8K
·
9.7K
·
almost 14 years

$25 million says you're wrong.

tradition and history
1.5K
·
9.9K
·
over 17 years

Ryan wrote:

$25 million says you're wrong.

Value and ability are not the same.

Head Sleuth
3K
·
19K
·
over 17 years

Buffon II wrote:

Not good enough for the Premier League.

Burnley will disagree with you on that one. I think he's good enough to be a decent striker for a lower end premier league club. 

Marquee
7.8K
·
9.7K
·
almost 14 years

Leggy wrote:

Ryan wrote:

$25 million says you're wrong.

Value and ability are not the same.

Then what defines value in a footballer?

Legend
2.7K
·
17K
·
over 17 years

Tegal wrote:

Buffon II wrote:

Not good enough for the Premier League.

Burnley will disagree with you on that one. I think he's good enough to be a decent striker for a lower end premier league club. 

Premier League clubs buy players who are not good enough for the top flight regularly. 

He will get on the end of a few balls in and score a few, but ultimately don't think he is cut out technically for that level.

Also worth noting he is the same striker as Vokes, so offers nothing different to him up top, and is probably a lesser striker.

Marquee
2.1K
·
6.4K
·
almost 15 years

A withdrawal from the AW's coming up ?

Marquee
7.8K
·
9.7K
·
almost 14 years

There's a difference between a football team which is a billionaires play thing and nd Burnley who apparently have the poorest ownership group in the premier league (worth tens of millions not billions). If they spend a record transfer fee on Wood its because they plan to play him.

LG
Legend
5.9K
·
24K
·
about 17 years

Leggy wrote:

Ryan wrote:

$25 million says you're wrong.

Value and ability are not the same.

Just ask Pogba. Horrid first half against Swansea.

Legend
2.7K
·
17K
·
over 17 years

Ryan wrote:

There's a difference between a football team which is a billionaires play thing and nd Burnley who apparently have the poorest ownership group in the premier league (worth tens of millions not billions). If they spend a record transfer fee on Wood its because they plan to play him.

That would be Burnley, 44th most valuable club in world football, with a higher brand value than Sevilla and Ajax. Hardly struggling to cobble a few pennies together.

And i'm sure he will play but if starts up front with Vokes that is two strikers with the exact same style of play which simply won't work.

HZA
Marquee
630
·
5.9K
·
about 15 years

I hope he fu cking slays.

#fakeittillyamakeit

Marquee
7.8K
·
9.7K
·
almost 14 years

Buffon II wrote:

Ryan wrote:

There's a difference between a football team which is a billionaires play thing and nd Burnley who apparently have the poorest ownership group in the premier league (worth tens of millions not billions). If they spend a record transfer fee on Wood its because they plan to play him.

That would be Burnley, 44th most valuable club in world football, with a higher brand value than Sevilla and Ajax. Hardly struggling to cobble a few pennies together.

And i'm sure he will play but if starts up front with Vokes that is two strikers with the exact same style of play which simply won't work.

Yep, they're one of the EPL 20 but worth and value aren't the same thing ?

First Team Squad
500
·
1.9K
·
over 17 years

Ryan wrote:

Leggy wrote:

Ryan wrote:

$25 million says you're wrong.

Value and ability are not the same.

Then what defines value in a footballer?

Scarcity? Who else was Burnley going to sign? Wood was one of the best strikers in the Championship last season. I think Wood could do well but he is a limited player. Doesn't create much for himself and is a real poacher.

Wood is good enough to be signed by a premier league club. Is he good enough to play 38 games and score around 15 goals? I'm doubtful but he has the chance to prove me wrong.

Marquee
7.8K
·
9.7K
·
almost 14 years

Ryan54 wrote:

Ryan wrote:

Leggy wrote:

Ryan wrote:

$25 million says you're wrong.

Value and ability are not the same.

Then what defines value in a footballer?

Scarcity? Who else was Burnley going to sign? Wood was one of the best strikers in the Championship last season. I think Wood could do well but he is a limited player. Doesn't create much for himself and is a real poacher.

Wood is good enough to be signed by a premier league club. Is he good enough to play 38 games and score around 15 goals? I'm doubtful but he has the chance to prove me wrong.

Well, he did have four assists last season.

Legend
2.7K
·
17K
·
over 17 years

Ryan wrote:

Ryan54 wrote:

Ryan wrote:

Leggy wrote:

Ryan wrote:

$25 million says you're wrong.

Value and ability are not the same.

Then what defines value in a footballer?

Scarcity? Who else was Burnley going to sign? Wood was one of the best strikers in the Championship last season. I think Wood could do well but he is a limited player. Doesn't create much for himself and is a real poacher.

Wood is good enough to be signed by a premier league club. Is he good enough to play 38 games and score around 15 goals? I'm doubtful but he has the chance to prove me wrong.

Well, he did have four assists last season.

4 assists in 40 odd games isn't that great a record.

Head Sleuth
3K
·
19K
·
over 17 years

Buffon II wrote:

Tegal wrote:

Buffon II wrote:

Not good enough for the Premier League.

Burnley will disagree with you on that one. I think he's good enough to be a decent striker for a lower end premier league club. 

Premier League clubs buy players who are not good enough for the top flight regularly. 

He will get on the end of a few balls in and score a few, but ultimately don't think he is cut out technically for that level.

Also worth noting he is the same striker as Vokes, so offers nothing different to him up top, and is probably a lesser striker.

True, you would know more than Burnley about his skills. They just spent a record fee on a player who isn't good enough for the league they play on. Silly them. 

Legend
2.7K
·
17K
·
over 17 years

Tegal wrote:

Buffon II wrote:

Tegal wrote:

Buffon II wrote:

Not good enough for the Premier League.

Burnley will disagree with you on that one. I think he's good enough to be a decent striker for a lower end premier league club. 

Premier League clubs buy players who are not good enough for the top flight regularly. 

He will get on the end of a few balls in and score a few, but ultimately don't think he is cut out technically for that level.

Also worth noting he is the same striker as Vokes, so offers nothing different to him up top, and is probably a lesser striker.

True, you would know more than Burnley about his skills. They just spent a record fee on a player who isn't good enough for the league they play on. Silly them. 

We'll see in 6 months time. Fancy a wager on how many he'll score then pal? You sound confident.

Marquee
7.8K
·
9.7K
·
almost 14 years

Buffon II wrote:

Ryan wrote:

Ryan54 wrote:

Ryan wrote:

Leggy wrote:

Ryan wrote:

$25 million says you're wrong.

Value and ability are not the same.

Then what defines value in a footballer?

Scarcity? Who else was Burnley going to sign? Wood was one of the best strikers in the Championship last season. I think Wood could do well but he is a limited player. Doesn't create much for himself and is a real poacher.

Wood is good enough to be signed by a premier league club. Is he good enough to play 38 games and score around 15 goals? I'm doubtful but he has the chance to prove me wrong.

Well, he did have four assists last season.

4 assists in 40 odd games isn't that great a record.


It's a good record for a striker, especially in a team where he scored half the goals and is higher than those who were competing for the golden boot with him.
Head Sleuth
3K
·
19K
·
over 17 years

Buffon II wrote:

Tegal wrote:

Buffon II wrote:

Tegal wrote:

Buffon II wrote:

Not good enough for the Premier League.

Burnley will disagree with you on that one. I think he's good enough to be a decent striker for a lower end premier league club. 

Premier League clubs buy players who are not good enough for the top flight regularly. 

He will get on the end of a few balls in and score a few, but ultimately don't think he is cut out technically for that level.

Also worth noting he is the same striker as Vokes, so offers nothing different to him up top, and is probably a lesser striker.

True, you would know more than Burnley about his skills. They just spent a record fee on a player who isn't good enough for the league they play on. Silly them. 

We'll see in 6 months time. Fancy a wager on how many he'll score then pal? You sound confident.

If he starts enough games, then he's good enough to be there. He's a top championship/lower EPL quality player. That's not really a huge or controversial call given his record, and level of interest from clubs (One of which paid a record fee for him..)

Marquee
4.5K
·
5.8K
·
about 12 years

When compared with other strikers who have made the jump as shown in the BBC article, his stats stack up.

Also, he's a different player to the one who had a few games as a 22 year old, or as an 18 year old. Vardy's record was worse than his at Championship level... different player, but people can make the step up.

WeeNix
200
·
950
·
over 14 years

Comparing 26yo Wood's record to 28yo Vokes' (and bearing in mind Vokes is in the middle of a run that is probably an outlier) I'd want Wood every day.

Marquee
2.5K
·
5.2K
·
over 17 years

As a Leeds fan I'm gutted.  Can quite easily see the two clubs trading places on the football league pyramid next season.  We're also a bigger team then them hands down... still £15k a week is not to be scoffed at. :-(

Marquee
970
·
6.5K
·
over 11 years

Marto wrote:

As a Leeds fan I'm gutted.  Can quite easily see the two clubs trading places on the football league pyramid next season.  We're also a bigger team then them hands down... still £15k a week is not to be scoffed at. :-(

15k? Isn't That what you guys were offering him in the improved 3 yr contract? I've seen reports he's on 20 to 30k at Burnley.

Obsessed
45
·
140
·
over 7 years

I thought he was on 20k a week when he first signed with Leeds

I think at that sort off price tag he would be on a minimum of 40k sterling a week

Legend
2.7K
·
17K
·
over 17 years

Tegal wrote:

Buffon II wrote:

Tegal wrote:

Buffon II wrote:

Tegal wrote:

Buffon II wrote:

Not good enough for the Premier League.

Burnley will disagree with you on that one. I think he's good enough to be a decent striker for a lower end premier league club. 

Premier League clubs buy players who are not good enough for the top flight regularly. 

He will get on the end of a few balls in and score a few, but ultimately don't think he is cut out technically for that level.

Also worth noting he is the same striker as Vokes, so offers nothing different to him up top, and is probably a lesser striker.

True, you would know more than Burnley about his skills. They just spent a record fee on a player who isn't good enough for the league they play on. Silly them. 

We'll see in 6 months time. Fancy a wager on how many he'll score then pal? You sound confident.

If he starts enough games, then he's good enough to be there. He's a top championship/lower EPL quality player. That's not really a huge or controversial call given his record, and level of interest from clubs (One of which paid a record fee for him..)

I disagree entirely. He is a striker. His job is to primarily score goals, or secondarily provide an effective outlet in the final third for attacks. If he gets starts or appearances off the bench then good on him, but you cannot say he is good enough to be there unless he actually contributes to the team in a positive fashion. If he doesn't, he is just another player given a chance who has shown to not be cut out for that level.

He may prove me wrong. Like i said i'm more than happy for a wager or two if people are confident he will succeed. I can donate money to a charity or your own bank account, whichever you choose. I don't see him having the ability to do well at Prem level. Championship yes, but not Prem.

TV
On probation
250
·
4.2K
·
over 13 years
Tall poppy bullshark - yawn
Groundskeeper Willie
700
·
7.5K
·
over 16 years
It'll probably largely depend on the quality of service (which can be effected by better quality defences ). It's not going to be easy for him but I think most people get that, even he would say that but he's earned the right to have a crack so good on him.
Marquee
620
·
6.3K
·
about 17 years

He will do well to score 10 goals me thinks...Peter Crouch did well enough tho so if Burnley can change their style it may well work.  I see the signing as hoping to keep them up rather than make them do well.

Starting XI
550
·
2.4K
·
almost 15 years

Burnley are just making up the numbers and will sink, Chris Wood and all.

Appiah without the pace
6.8K
·
19K
·
about 17 years

YoungHeart wrote:

detoxin wrote:
He just tweeted he not playing today as in talks with Prem club

And some cracking comments from some upset Leeds supporters to accompany it.

somewhat hilarious given they were booing him this time last year.
Marquee
970
·
6.5K
·
over 11 years

Buffon II wrote:

Tegal wrote:

Buffon II wrote:

Tegal wrote:

Buffon II wrote:

Not good enough for the Premier League.

Burnley will disagree with you on that one. I think he's good enough to be a decent striker for a lower end premier league club. 

Premier League clubs buy players who are not good enough for the top flight regularly. 

He will get on the end of a few balls in and score a few, but ultimately don't think he is cut out technically for that level.

Also worth noting he is the same striker as Vokes, so offers nothing different to him up top, and is probably a lesser striker.

True, you would know more than Burnley about his skills. They just spent a record fee on a player who isn't good enough for the league they play on. Silly them. 

We'll see in 6 months time. Fancy a wager on how many he'll score then pal? You sound confident.

Burnley had 20 shots on goal v WBA and missed with all of them. This has not gone unnoticed. Wood will get game time next week v Spurs for sure.

First Kiwi to score at Wembley?

You’ll need an account to join the conversation!

Sign in Sign up