Post history

History for Half a Pint

Current version

Posted July 11, 2024 23:01 · last edited July 11, 2024 23:01

SamCoughlan

It's probably better than letting him go for free when his contract expires next year. Plus I'm sure an MLS team's idea of a nominal fee is higher than ours.

Also the Herald article calls it a 'Significant fee' which certainly sounds better than nominal fee.

On the USA side they've said nominal and on the NZ side it's now been said as 'significant' which makes it sound like it is just how each side of the transfer considers the fee compared to their budget - at least that's what I'm hoping...

Previous versions

1 version

Unknown editor edited July 11, 2024 23:01

SamCoughlan

It's probably better than letting him go for free when his contract expires next year. Plus I'm sure an MLS team's idea of a nominal fee is higher than ours.

Also the Herlad article calls it a 'Significant fee' which certainly sounds better than nominal fee.

On the USA side they've said nominal and on the NZ side it's now been said as 'significant' which makes it sound like it is just how each side of the transfer considers the fee compared to their budget - at least that's what I'm hoping...