Current version

Posted June 30, 2014 23:12 · last edited June 30, 2014 23:13

Blew.2 wrote:

Jeff Vader wrote:

This is a bit of a problem for the FFA because if you have a deal you don't like, you just sell the club up to a 'new entity' and don't offer that player a contract. That's exactly what would be set with this kind of precedent. Based on that, I don't see how FFA can allow the Phoenix to sign McGlinchey.

Was his contract expected to end at the end of last season or the end of the loan period.  

Had another year on it, so ending end of next season.

Previous versions

1 version
Ryan edited June 30, 2014 23:13
Blew.2 wrote:
Jeff Vader wrote:

This is a bit of a problem for the FFA because if you have a deal you don't like, you just sell the club up to a 'new entity' and don't offer that player a contract. That's exactly what would be set with this kind of precedent. Based on that, I don't see how FFA can allow the Phoenix to sign McGlinchey.

Was his contract expected to end at the end of last season or the end of the loan period.  

Had another year on it, so ending end of next season. However they expected Sendai and Arnold to buy him by the sounds of things and were a bit lax about the whole situation.