Posted July 09, 2014 07:31 · last edited July 09, 2014 07:31
When the Knightz folded and NZF took them over for a few games at the end of the season and Ricki was put in charge, didn't a whole heap of players walk?
It wouldn't surprise me if, contrary to what Midfielder says, clubs are obliged to take on existing contracts under an ownership change, but players are not.
When the Knightz folded and NZF took them over for a few games at the end of the season when Ricki took them over, didn't a whole heap of players walk?
It wouldn't surprise me if, contrary to what Midfielder says, clubs are obliged to take on existing contracts under an ownership change, but players are not.