Posted August 27, 2014 09:08 · last edited August 27, 2014 09:19
right. Except that there appears to be a fair amount of misinformation given out. Which it seems could amount to bad faith.
Do you not get a fee? What happened to that?? If CCM are party to the agreement then how is it possible for McG to cancel his agreement without them being privy to it? Was WeeMac and the rest not told that the club was to change its ownership company and the public thought this was the case until recently?
and if they are planning to do what Tegal says above......
right. Except that there appears to be a fair amount of misinformation given out. Which it seems could amount to bad faith.
Do you not get a fee? What happened to that?? If CCM are party to the agreement then how is it possible for McG to cancel his agreement without them being privy to it? Was WeeMac and the rest not told that the club was to change its ownership company and the public thought this was the case until recently?
and if they are planning to do what Tegal says above doesn't that just make you a pack of ....?
right. Except that there appears to be a fair amount of misinformation given out. Which it seems could amount to bad faith.
Do you not get a fee? What happened to that?? If CCM are party to the agreement then how is it possible for McG to cancel his agreement without them being privy to it? Was WeeMac and the rest not told that the club was to change it's ownership company and the public thought this was the case until recently?