Did you just copy and paste your earlier post?
You may as well have.
that may be true, but it does not change the appearance that the PFA used a technicality to get a player out of a contract, when they would scream blue murder if an owner used the same technicality to get rid of a player
I am not sure CCM did anything wrong here
CCM at worst changed their mind about something, but at the time they had no legal obligation to do option a or b [one has to presume, because they did get to change their mind]
and sure option b may have allowed them to avoid debt, or some such, something our terry was also famous for
it's the FFA that advised everybody to act as if it was definitely option b, without securing that legally with CCM
and it was the PFA that used the loophole in option b to get McGlinchey off a contract, without confirmation from CCM as to their intentions
I may be totally wrong but, unless people have info I am not aware of, a lot of Nix supporters are jumping to conclusions that make us feel good, but aren't conclusions necessarily consistent with the facts
maybe dodgy all round, but to paint PFA and Nix and McG as pure as the driven snow is a bit of a stretch imho