Current version

Posted August 08, 2017 20:18 · last edited August 08, 2017 20:21

TopLeft07 wrote:
My point is only strengthened by the fact that you were happy to say Hudson is 100% correct without Boyd's side of the story and with the little information from Hudson - then consider Hudson isn't exactly 100% credible when he speaks. On the contrary I never said Boyd is 100% correct but it's fair to add balance to the debate.

Based on the information at hand Hudson is 100% correct, you can only work with what is in public. Boyd has a twitter account if he cared at all he would post some information. In fact, he hasn't posted anything to do with the All Whites in years, only his club side.

Previous versions

1 version
Unknown editor edited August 08, 2017 20:21
TopLeft07 wrote:
My point is only strengthened by the fact that you were happy to say Hudson is 100% correct without Boyd's side of the story and with the little information from Hudson - then consider Hudson isn't exactly 100% credible when he speaks. On the contrary I never said Boyd is 100% correct but it's fair to add balance to the debate.

Based on the information at hand Hudson is 100% correct, you can only work with what is in public. Boyd has a twitter account if he cared at all he would post some information. In fact, he's never posted anything to do with the All Whites only his club side.