Milne out - Henry in.
Hopefully they'll play him because: A) He's been playing cricket so is match fit and B) the Safs won't have done much/any planning work on him.
Don't think Williamson choked at all; righted the ship, as he has to do basically every game, when McCullum swung out.
McCullum's after match comment was interesting. He basically said that why bother changing the way anyone is playing? If one or two fail then there is always someone who steps up. If it comes off early, you already take the opposition out of the game. Stay reckless and aggressive fellas!!
"...sure beats doin' stuff."
If NZ get knocked out in the semi, I'm not sure how this can be considered a failure. They are playing a team ranked above them and they are 4th in those rankings. Logic suggests that anything higher than the semis is an over-achievement.
My money is still on SA or Australia to win it which I have maintained from the start. I don't believe that Australia will lose this at home to be more specific however.
Grumpy old bastard alert
Don't think Williamson choked at all; righted the ship, as he has to do basically every game, when McCullum swung out.
McCullum's after match comment was interesting. He basically said that why bother changing the way anyone is playing? If one or two fail then there is always someone who steps up. If it comes off early, you already take the opposition out of the game. Stay reckless and aggressive fellas!!
Old fashioned this.
McCullum is no fool, if he thought that he was the only top tier batsman in the team I think we'd see him play a bit more conservatively. But it's a very balanced team and any of the top order batsman have the ability to pick up the slack if a few players get out cheaply at the top. McCullum playing the way he does is a risk, but it's a calculated risk, and it's clearly working.
Unbeaten into the semis... I wouldn't call that terribly reckless. It's a plan, and it's working.
We don't have the players to compete by playing textbook cricket.
i think it is reckless but in the best sense of the word. Teams expect at this stage opposition to go into their shell - playes like ABV, McCullum and Maxwell won't do this and this makes for exciting reckless cricket (with an insurance policy)
"...sure beats doin' stuff."
Not sure about Australia winning, all of their 4 world cup wins have been away from home so they'll have to wait till 2019 to try again. As for India, one away and one at home. Australia will account for them in the final, think they have a mental block when it comes to playing Australia.
Not sure about Australia winning, all of their 4 world cup wins have been away from home so they'll have to wait till 2019 to try again. As for India, one away and one at home. Australia will account for them in the final, think they have a mental block when it comes to playing Australia.
I've re-read that post several times now and i'm struggling to comprehend it.
Three for me, and two for them.
Not sure about Australia winning, all of their 4 world cup wins have been away from home so they'll have to wait till 2019 to try again. As for India, one away and one at home. Australia will account for them in the final, think they have a mental block when it comes to playing Australia.
I've re-read that post several times now and i'm struggling to comprehend it.
Not sure about Australia winning, all of their 4 world cup wins have been away from home so they'll have to wait till 2019 to try again. As for India, one away and one at home. Australia will account for them in the final, think they have a mental block when it comes to playing Australia.
I've re-read that post several times now and i'm struggling to comprehend it.
Translation
Australia won't win the world cup because they are playing at home and they've never won it at home. Thus 4 more years.
India have won twice - one of those wins was in England that other in India. I believe India have a mental block when it comes to playing Australia in Australia, therefore I don't think they will win their semi final on Wednesday.
Not sure about Australia winning, all of their 4 world cup wins have been away from home so they'll have to wait till 2019 to try again. As for India, one away and one at home. Australia will account for them in the final, think they have a mental block when it comes to playing Australia.
I've re-read that post several times now and i'm struggling to comprehend it.
Translation
Australia won't win the world cup because they are playing at home and they've never won it at home. Thus 4 more years.
India have won twice - one of those wins was in England that other in India. I believe India have a mental block when it comes to playing Australia in Australia, therefore I don't think they will win their semi final on Wednesday.
Alternative Translation.
I'm not quite sure who's sh!ttest, Aus or Ind. Neither of them will win and they will just make tomorrows game the final. Screw convention.
"...sure beats doin' stuff."
Rain forecast before the game tomorrow and clearing as they look to start. Bowl first me-thinks.
People like Coldplay and voted for the Nazis. You can't trust people.
Rain forecast before the game tomorrow and clearing as they look to start. Bowl first me-thinks.
Every game is completely different.
If you are old and wise you were probably young and stupid
Rain forecast before the game tomorrow and clearing as they look to start. Bowl first me-thinks.
Every game is completely different.
People like Coldplay and voted for the Nazis. You can't trust people.
Rain forecast before the game tomorrow and clearing as they look to start. Bowl first me-thinks.
Every game is completely different.
Players can have an on/off day. Weather, ground conditions.Luck.
If you are old and wise you were probably young and stupid
Rain forecast before the game tomorrow and clearing as they look to start. Bowl first me-thinks.
Every game is completely different.
Players can have an on/off day. Weather, ground conditions.Luck.
People like Coldplay and voted for the Nazis. You can't trust people.
Rain forecast before the game tomorrow and clearing as they look to start. Bowl first me-thinks.
Every game is completely different.
Players can have an on/off day. Weather, ground conditions.Luck.
We will see.
If you are old and wise you were probably young and stupid
Re the conditions and the toss. I think the possibilty of swing and the extra bounce are important factors which will be right up there with anything else they're considering. The opposition of course are probably the biggest factor. The stats in Wellington say you should bowl first but McCullum put WI in the field based on who they were playing. I can't really pick it and that's after talking to players/coaches. Milne's replacement is also a hard one to pick. Pretty pumped whatever happens, huge day for sport in NZ's history.
Fuck this stupid game
Raining in Auckland as I type - according to the Radio. Wednesday is a reserve day apparently.
Feeling confident and nervous. Didn't really believe that stuff about choking. That said it would be nice for BMac to roll over the top of the Saffas after Boult, Southee, Vettori and Henry decimated them and watch them fold up the way Leighbo was predicting. that would be a decent day!!
Just a quick message for our little Yellow Fever cricket family - Team, we've been through a lot following this team. A day like today could make it all worthwhile. It's been a pleasure sharing the highs and lows with you all and may there be many more! Cmon boys!
www.kiwifromthecouch.blogspot.com
I just feel that RSA are going on and on about being the best but are very fragile under the surface - the fact they keep spouting it, shows they are trying to convince themselves otherwise.
IND, AUS and NZL are just getting on with it, keeping to themselves and making it matter on the field.
"...sure beats doin' stuff."
This topic is locked.