I agree with what both of you have said that test cricket is the ultimate yardstick but i think you can separate the two. So when making comments about Bracewell you have to acknowledge the success he has had in the ODI arena. Also Astle, Fleming, Vettori in books released recently and in comments from Cairns and McMillan place as much of the blame at the feet of Charlesworth as they do at Bracewell and it seems to me that NZ cricket wanted to make Charlesworth an influential figure
To me tests are what cricket is all about, one dayers are just an added bonus.
Although I love all forms of the game (Right thru from Tests to ODI's to Cricket 6's to Double Wicket) and believe they bring there own unique brand of entertainment, I find test matches and First Class Matches MUCH more entertaining than there limited over cousins because the teams have to work so much harder for a victory.
You can fluke a T20 match and to a point a 100 over match however it is almost impossible to fluck a victory over 450+ overs.
And I believe if you fail at test cricket then you haven't succeeded as a coach or a team.Gangsta!2008-10-06 22:30:30