What the hell, reminiscing about Paulo Rossi's hattrick against Brazil in 1982.
Italy 3 Brazil 2. Against football gods Zico, Socrates, Falcao, Junior.
Permalink
Permalink
just cos i like to be pedantic, & cos it gets my post count up, but surely this is ON topic?
great hattrick btw
Salmon swim upstream
Permalink
Permalink
I reckon it would be lost in the "general" footie section.
His goals against Poland were pretty special too.
Did you see how fast Socrates and Falcao were?
Permalink
Permalink
Wasn't Socrates a philosopher?
Kickito ergo sum
now we can really taken this off topic
Salmon swim upstream
Permalink
Permalink
Now you got me thinkign- the classic conundrum- the Philosopher's XI:
Starting with either Albert Camus or Pope John Paul II in goal
both were keepers
defenders?
Salmon swim upstream
Permalink
Permalink
why would socrates want to Kick Ito?
When you watched him he was more like poetry in motion - maybe that's a kind of philosophy (the Zen of Football).
Falcao was a singer (der Komissar) and junior was anything but.
Amazing that they somehow joined to become the most talented but unsuccesful World Cup team.
When you watched him he was more like poetry in motion - maybe that's a kind of philosophy (the Zen of Football).
Falcao was a singer (der Komissar) and junior was anything but.
Amazing that they somehow joined to become the most talented but unsuccesful World Cup team.
"Phoenix till they lose"
Posting 97% bollox, 8% lies and 3.658% genuine opinion.
Genuine opinion: FTFFA
Permalink
Permalink
Now you got me thinkign- the classic conundrum- the Philosopher's XI:
Starting with either Albert Camus or Pope John Paul II in goal
both were keepers
defenders?
It's like that post card
Heaven is where the food is French, the Italians are the lovers, justice is British and the trains are run on time by the Swiss,
Hell is where the food is British, the Italians run the trains, the justice system is French and all the lovers are Swiss but at least they are on time.
Permalink
Permalink
Ah, how my dad talks so fondly of this hatrick!
Permalink
Permalink
Now you got me thinkign- the classic conundrum- the Philosopher's XI:
�
Starting with either Albert Camus or Pope John Paul II in goal
�
both were keepers
�
defenders?
It's like that post card
Heaven is where the food is French, the Italians are the lovers, justice is British and the trains are run on time�by the Swiss,
Hell is where the food is British, the Italians run the trains, the justice system is French and all the lovers are Swiss but at least they are on�time.
�
If it was an Australian philosophers XI - it would be easy:
Bruce (Uni of Wollamalloo),
Bruce (Uni of Wollamalloo),
Bruce (Uni of Wollamalloo),
Bruce (Uni of Wollamalloo),
Bruce (Uni of Wollamalloo),
Bruce (Uni of Wollamalloo), etc etc
"Yes Socrates himself was particularly missed,
A lovely little thinker, but a b%gg$er when he's p!ssed."
"Phoenix till they lose"
Posting 97% bollox, 8% lies and 3.658% genuine opinion.
Genuine opinion: FTFFA
Permalink
Permalink
Socrates the inventor of the modern hypothesis I.e. Eliminate contradictory hypotheses, keep testing until you get a hypothesis that is true.
He must have eliminated eveything a few times because he also said "I know that I know nothing".
Plato is his student who spread Socrates' techniques.
He must have eliminated eveything a few times because he also said "I know that I know nothing".
Plato is his student who spread Socrates' techniques.
Permalink
Permalink
Plato they say, could stick it away, half a crate of whiskey every day.
Aristotle, Aristotle was a b&gger for the bottle.
Hobbs was fond of his dram
And Rene Descartes was a drunken f@rt "I drink therfore I am..."
Aristotle, Aristotle was a b&gger for the bottle.
Hobbs was fond of his dram
And Rene Descartes was a drunken f@rt "I drink therfore I am..."
"Phoenix till they lose"
Posting 97% bollox, 8% lies and 3.658% genuine opinion.
Genuine opinion: FTFFA
Permalink
Permalink
here's a few more missing lines
there's nothing Neitze, couldn't teach about the raising of the wrist
....
Iiiiimanuel Kant was a real pissant
who was very rarely stable
Heidegger Heidegger was a boozy beggar
who could drink you under the table
...
or something like that and then
a line about someone who could
"out-consume Schopenhauer and Hegel"
a classic 
could google it but that would spoil the fun
Permalink
Permalink
If it was an Australian philosophers XI - it would be easy:
Bruce (Uni of Wollamalloo),
Bruce (Uni of Wollamalloo),
Bruce (Uni of Wollamalloo),
Bruce (Uni of Wollamalloo),
Bruce (Uni of Wollamalloo),
Bruce (Uni of Wollamalloo), etc etc
Sorry to be pedantic but it's actually "Woolloomooloo".
Carry On...
"Ive just re-visited this and once again realised that C-Diddy is a genius - a drunk, Newcastle bred disgrace - but a genius." - Hard News, 11:39am 4th June 2009
Permalink
Permalink
Fair dinkum C-Diddy. Mind if I call you Bruce to avoid confusion?
"Phoenix till they lose"
Posting 97% bollox, 8% lies and 3.658% genuine opinion.
Genuine opinion: FTFFA
Permalink
Permalink