Starting XI
1.4K
·
4.5K
·
over 16 years
N-Bomb wrote:
Yes I agree, but he was being called 'a giant-killer' when he beat Verdasco who gave up, Querrey who has been rubbish for over a year, and Dolgo who was taken to 5 sets by Greg Jones and Tobias Kamke.

Certainly should be a top-10 player however


Yea, they were decent wins, but hardly giants. Of course, Murray tore him to pieces the other week in Brisbane, so the writing was sort of on the wall against Federer, though he did win a set of Federer last year, which I was hoping he may repeat and make a match of it.Colvinator2012-01-23 15:07:44
Marquee
380
·
9.6K
·
over 17 years
Tsonga loss giving Murray an easier path.
Marquee
380
·
9.6K
·
over 17 years
Groundskeeper Willie
700
·
7.5K
·
over 16 years
Novak well off his game here. Appears to be struggling physically
Groundskeeper Willie
700
·
7.5K
·
over 16 years
Legend
2.6K
·
17K
·
over 17 years
Marquee
380
·
9.6K
·
over 17 years
Top four all set to square off then. Looking forward to this.
Starting XI
1.4K
·
4.5K
·
over 16 years
Groundskeeper Willie
700
·
7.5K
·
over 16 years
Buffon II wrote:
Novak is a god.

A tennis god.
This. And I'm confident he'll step up another level and roll murray in 3, four max.
Groundskeeper Willie
700
·
7.5K
·
over 16 years
Colvinator wrote:

It's looking all to familiar for Murray.

this is what you meant right?
Starting XI
99
·
3.7K
·
over 14 years
Groundskeeper Willie
700
·
7.5K
·
over 16 years
Looks like it may be another late night on the couch watching epic tennis.
WeeNix
1
·
670
·
about 13 years
Im picking Nadal at the moment but it's so close.
Legend
2.6K
·
17K
·
over 17 years
Groundskeeper Willie
700
·
7.5K
·
over 16 years
I'm surprised Nadal won that after the way Fed started. How good is this tennis though. Looking forward to tomorrow night's formality.
Marquee
250
·
7.7K
·
over 17 years
TopLeft07 wrote:
I'm surprised Nadal won that after the way Fed started. How good is this tennis though. Looking forward to tomorrow night's formality.
After watching this, and about 5 minutes of some women's/shrieking semis (it's all I could manage), seriously, how did the shriekers manage to get equal pay with the men?   The difference in standard, quality, and entertainment value is quite frankly, gigantic.  It's a joke, really. 
 
Get back in the kitchen and cook me some eggs, ladies.  Coz your tennis is sh*t.
Stevo2012-01-27 02:22:35
Marquee
380
·
9.6K
·
over 17 years
Stevo wrote:

After watching this, and about 5 minutes of some women's/shrieking semis (it's all I could manage), seriously, how did�the shriekers�manage to get�equal pay with the men?� �The difference in standard, quality, and entertainment value is quite frankly, gigantic.� It's a joke, really.�


Agreed.
Starting XI
99
·
3.7K
·
over 14 years
Arsenal wrote:
Stevo wrote:

After watching this, and about 5 minutes of some women's/shrieking semis (it's all I could manage), seriously, how did the shriekers manage to get equal pay with the men?   The difference in standard, quality, and entertainment value is quite frankly, gigantic.  It's a joke, really. 


Agreed.

 
Yes, agreed.

Marquee
380
·
9.6K
·
over 17 years
On that note, saw a classic tweet yesterday something along the lines of:

'Wondering when it's my turn to be women's world number 1 in tennis...that's how it works right?'

Starting XI
1.4K
·
4.5K
·
over 16 years

Tricky thing about the "Federer is the greatest player ever" call, is that Nadal consistently beats him. Obviously Federer is a great player, but it is worth noting that he won a bunch of slams just by beating the likes of Henman, Hewitt, and Roddick.

Nadal was looking good last night though. He'll be tough for Murray in the final, and Nadal gets an extra days rest.
Woof Woof
2.7K
·
19K
·
almost 17 years
As much as it pains me to say this, but Murray will get absolutely slaughtered by the Serb.
Legend
2.6K
·
17K
·
over 17 years
Groundskeeper Willie
700
·
7.5K
·
over 16 years
Murray in the final colvinator? Have you forgot who he's playing in the semi? Unless I've missed something and Novak has pulled out of the tournament it aint g'na happen.
Starting XI
70
·
3.1K
·
almost 14 years
Unless Novak's injury pops up then I can't see it. Novak in 4 for me.

Agree with all the equal pay stuff, and add the fact that the men play for longer makes it a bigger joke
Starting XI
1.4K
·
4.5K
·
over 16 years
Djokovic will have to play better than he did against Ferrer, though it wouldn't be a surprise to see them both step their game up. If Djokovic does have issues with his leg and isn't moving well (like the other day), then I certainly think Murray will win
Marquee
380
·
9.6K
·
over 17 years
First set to Djokovic...trying to slyly watch it online at work.
Marquee
1.7K
·
7.5K
·
about 17 years
Marquee
380
·
9.6K
·
over 17 years
Legend
2.6K
·
17K
·
over 17 years
Brilliant break. Come on Novak don't let that Scottish c**t back in.
Marquee
380
·
9.6K
·
over 17 years
Starting XI
300
·
4K
·
about 17 years
I think the key question is. Will Novak be able to keep up with Murray. Andy looks far more fitter
Heaven knows I'm miserable now
280
·
5.2K
·
almost 16 years
Buffon II wrote:
Brilliant break. Come on Novak don't let that Scottish c**t back in.


Mildly racist/xenophobic is it not? Dickhead.
Legend
2.6K
·
17K
·
over 17 years
Marquee
380
·
9.6K
·
over 17 years
Steve-O wrote:

Buffon II wrote:
Brilliant break. Come on Novak don't let that Scottish c**t back in.
Mildly racist/xenophobic is it not? Dickhead.


Pipe down you miserable Scot.
Heaven knows I'm miserable now
280
·
5.2K
·
almost 16 years
Buffon II wrote:
Scottish isn't a race.


That's why I also put xenophobic.

And the UN would say your comment was racist.

Legal

The UN does not define "racism", however it does define "racial discrimination": According to the United Nations Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination,

the term "racial discrimination" shall mean any distinction, exclusion, restriction, or preference based on race, colour, descent, or national or ethnic origin that has the purpose or effect of nullifying or impairing the recognition, enjoyment or exercise, on an equal footing, of human rights and fundamental freedoms in the political, economic, social, cultural or any other field of public life.[12]

This definition does not make any difference between discrimination based on ethnicity and race, in part because the distinction between the two remains debatable among anthropologists.[13] Similarly, in British law the phrase racial group means "any group of people who are defined by reference to their race, colour, nationality (including citizenship) or ethnic or national origin"

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Racism

Steve-O2012-01-28 00:07:18
Legend
2.6K
·
17K
·
over 17 years
Marquee
380
·
9.6K
·
over 17 years
Heaven knows I'm miserable now
280
·
5.2K
·
almost 16 years
Buffon II wrote:
Boo hoo.


Good response. Go back to reading Mein Kampf and whatever else you get up to in your spare time.
Legend
2.6K
·
17K
·
over 17 years
Massive lols. I don't like Scots so now i'm a Nazi.
Heaven knows I'm miserable now
280
·
5.2K
·
almost 16 years
Buffon II wrote:
Massive lols. I don't like Scots so now i'm a Nazi.


Jews, Scots, you all start somewhere.

You’ll need an account to join the conversation!

Sign in Sign up