History for AucklandPhoenix

Tegal, are you posting the above definition to illustrate that when someone says that we have full employment, it is a nonsense, as if that person had worked one hour last week he is deemed to be employed by the above definition?

Please elaborate.

And how would anyone know if I was actually searching for a job?

The real unemployed are those whom are on the dole. There are thousands whom are not who should be recorded and are not.

My uncle's has been self employed as a film editor for a number of years. He got sick for a bit, got better, had lost his contracts and basically hadn't worked for a year. He thought blow this I've been paying tax all my life, I'm going to be a statistic recorded. Attempted to apply at WINZ, not eligible for anything as his wife earned too much and he had a mortgage free house. He has never officially been recorded as unemployed. For all the government knows he has been having a holiday for the last year.

Hopefully this sort of crap will change with Bill and Don Key gone.

Tegal, are you posting the above definition to illustrate that when someone says that we have full employment, it is a nonsense, as if that person had worked one hour last week he is deemed to be employed by the above definition?

Please elaborate.

And how would anyone know if I was actually searching for a job?

The real unemployed are those whom are on the dole. There are thousands whom are not who should be recorded and are not.

My uncle's has been self employed as a film editor for a number of years. He got sick for a bit, got better, had lost his contracts and basically hadn't worked for a year. He thought blow this I've been paying tax all my life, I'm going to be a statistic recorded. Attempted to apply at WINZ, not eligible for anything as his wife earned too much and he had a mortgage free house. He has never officially been recorded as unemployed. For all the government knows he has been having a holiday for the last year.

Tegal, are you posting the above definition to illustrate that when someone says that we have full employment, it is a nonsense, as if that person had worked one hour last week he is deemed to be employed by the above definition?

Please elaborate.

And how would anyone know if I was actually searching for a job?

The real unemployed are those whom are on the dole. There are thousands whom are not who should be recorded and are not.

My uncle's has been self employed as a film editor for a number of years. He got sick for a bit, got better, had lost his contracts and basically hadn't worked for a year. He thought blow this I've been paying tax all my life, I'm going to be a statistic recoded. Attempted to apply at WINZ, not eligible for anything as his wife earned too much and he had a mortgage free house. He has never officially been recorded as unemployed. For all the government knows he has been having a holiday for the last year.

Tegal, are you posting the above definition to illustrate that when someone says that we have full employment, it is a nonsense, as if that person had worked one hour last week he is deemed to be employed by the above definition?

Please elaborate.

And how would anyone know if I was actually searching for a job?

The real unemployed are those whom are on the dole. There are thousands whom are not who should be recorded and are not.

Tegal, are you posting the above definition to illustrate that when someone says that we have full employment, it is a nonsense, as if that person had worked one hour last week he is deemed to be employed by the above definition?

Please elaborate.

And how would anyone know if I was actually searching for a job?

Tegal, are you posting the above definition to illustrate that when someone says that we have full employment, it is a nonsense, as if that person had worked one hour last week he is deemed to be employed by the above definition?

Please elaborate.

And how would anyone know if I was actually searching for a job or for that matter had left work last week?

Tegal, are you posting the above definition to illustrate that when someone says that we have full employment, it is a nonsense, as if that person had worked one hour last week he is deemed to be employed by the above definition?

Please elaborate.

Yes Tegal, your point being?