Post history

History for Christchurch Rangers

Things that make you go hmmmm

Back to topic

Current version

Posted July 09, 2018 01:05 · last edited July 09, 2018 01:07

Bullion wrote:

Christchurch Rangers wrote:

Bullion wrote:

Christchurch Rangers wrote:

el grapadura wrote:

Hmmmmm...

How come the only people who have ever been racist to me have all been under 30 and without exception?

I call BS on that "scientific study"

Your anecdotes > scientific study?

scientific study my ass

more like presenting findings tailoedr to suit a narrative being pushed by the author.

Bit liike how corporations like Coca Cola get their own "scientific studies" done that show that hey drinking sugary drinks is not going to cause you health problems.

At this stage you would defend your position with contradictory scientific studies or criticisms in the methodology of the scientific study that could result in incorrect interpretation. Until then I am inclined to think that a scientific study holds more weight than your anecdotal evidence.

You are perfectly entitled to think what you want.

And so am I. 

But while this *cough* scientific study may be ok on a physiological level it simply remains subjective on other levels like what is and what isnt offensive, that is not science that is opinion, 

Big difference

Previous versions

2 versions
Unknown editor edited July 09, 2018 01:07
Bullion wrote:
Christchurch Rangers wrote:
Bullion wrote:
Christchurch Rangers wrote:
el grapadura wrote:

Hmmmmm...

How come the only people who have ever been racist to me have all been under 30 and without exception?

I call BS on that "scientific study"

Your anecdotes > scientific study?

scientific study my ass

more like presenting findings tailoedr to suit a narrative being pushed by the author.

Bit liike how corporations like Coca Cola get their own "scientific studies" done that show that hey drinking sugary drinks is not going to cause you health problems.

At this stage you would defend your position with contradictory scientific studies or criticisms in the methodology of the scientific study that could result in incorrect interpretation. Until then I am inclined to think that a scientific study holds more weight than your anecdotal evidence.

You are perfectly entitles to think what you want.

And so am I. 

But while this *cough* scientific study may be ok on a physiological level it simply remains subjective on other levels like what is and what isnt offensive, that is not science that is opinion, 

Big difference

Unknown editor edited July 09, 2018 01:06
Bullion wrote:
Christchurch Rangers wrote:
Bullion wrote:
Christchurch Rangers wrote:
el grapadura wrote:

Hmmmmm...

How come the only people who have ever been racist to me have all been under 30 and without exception?

I call BS on that "scientific study"

Your anecdotes > scientific study?

scientific study my ass

more like presenting findings tailoedr to suit a narrative being pushed by the author.

Bit liike how corporations like Coca Cola get their own "scientific studies" done that show that hey drinking sugary drinks is not going to cause you health problems.

At this stage you would defend your position with contradictory scientific studies or criticisms in the methodology of the scientific study that could result in incorrect interpretation. Until then I am inclined to think that a scientific study holds more weight than your anecdotal evidence.

You are perfectly entitles to think what you want.

And so am I. 

But this *cough* scientific study ok on a physiological level but simply remains subjective on other levels like what is and what isnt offensive, that is not science that is opinion, 

Big difference