Post history

History for sthn.jeff

USA Election

Back to topic

Current version

Posted November 10, 2016 00:13 · last edited November 10, 2016 00:16

Ryan wrote:

Bullion wrote:

sthn.jeff wrote:

Bullion wrote:

sthn.jeff wrote:

Bullion wrote:

sthn.jeff wrote:

Oska wrote:

sthn.jeff wrote:

i wasnt aware of that. Well I suppose it has been Liberal for years now so as i say thats democracy

The indefinite tenure and overriding power of USSC Justices makes it highly undemocratic, and is going to mean harmful oppression of the rights of millions of people on the basis of religious beliefs. So much progress made for minorities is going to be undone by this.

Such as the the "right" to things like Late Term Abortions? 

It is funny how it suddenly becomes undemocratic when "the otherside" win. 

That is not a thing, purely scare mongering - if you think that is a thing you have been had. Hook, line and sinker.

Approx 1m abortions in the US of which apprx 1.5% are late term  (after 20 weeks) so yes it is a thing

That does not take into account any reasons for medically terminating a pregnancy - many women that would have had abortions would have liked to carry to term but are not able to.

And, I take back the hyperbole I used - I was expecting Trump language, which he is basically describing a c-section.

Or the baby having Downs Syndrome or Cerebral Paulsy ?

If you are worried they do screening tests before 21 weeks to see the likelihood of Downs Syndrome and other genetic disorders, if based on the screening tests and taking into account other risk factors (age etc.) you can get more tests done to get a diagnosis and then determine if you want to abort the pregnancy or not. This is all up the parent/s choice and if any decision is made to terminate the pregnancy based on those conditions it will be done well before 21 weeks.

I have just been through all of this.

I hope everything was clear.

And @sthn.jeff the National Review is hardly the bastion of independent and politically neutral journalism, you're going to have to find a better source.

haha says the man quoting Gordon Campbell stories. If you think any journalist is neutral  ......

EDIT Sorry it was not you quoting Campbell but second half of my comment stands

Previous versions

1 version
sthn.jeff edited November 10, 2016 00:16
Ryan wrote:
Bullion wrote:
sthn.jeff wrote:
Bullion wrote:
sthn.jeff wrote:
Bullion wrote:
sthn.jeff wrote:
Oska wrote:
sthn.jeff wrote:

i wasnt aware of that. Well I suppose it has been Liberal for years now so as i say thats democracy
The indefinite tenure and overriding power of USSC Justices makes it highly undemocratic, and is going to mean harmful oppression of the rights of millions of people on the basis of religious beliefs. So much progress made for minorities is going to be undone by this.
Such as the the "right" to things like Late Term Abortions? 

It is funny how it suddenly becomes undemocratic when "the otherside" win. 

That is not a thing, purely scare mongering - if you think that is a thing you have been had. Hook, line and sinker.

Approx 1m abortions in the US of which apprx 1.5% are late term  (after 20 weeks) so yes it is a thing

That does not take into account any reasons for medically terminating a pregnancy - many women that would have had abortions would have liked to carry to term but are not able to.

And, I take back the hyperbole I used - I was expecting Trump language, which he is basically describing a c-section.

Or the baby having Downs Syndrome or Cerebral Paulsy ?

If you are worried they do screening tests before 21 weeks to see the likelihood of Downs Syndrome and other genetic disorders, if based on the screening tests and taking into account other risk factors (age etc.) you can get more tests done to get a diagnosis and then determine if you want to abort the pregnancy or not. This is all up the parent/s choice and if any decision is made to terminate the pregnancy based on those conditions it will be done well before 21 weeks.

I have just been through all of this.

I hope everything was clear.

And @sthn.jeff the National Review is hardly the bastion of independent and politically neutral journalism, you're going to have to find a better source.

haha says the man quoting Gordon Campbell stories. If you think any journalist is neutral