http://www.rugbyfoundation.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=33&hl=
"I attended a few of the Canterbury games this year and there is just no atmosphere. I think there is 3 main reasons for this
1 .Is a majority of sports supporters in NZ have become apatehtic. The only real supporters now who are showing their real colours and showing up all other supporters in NZ are the Wellington Phoenix supporters (as much as it hurts me to say this not being a football fan) but these guys create an atmosphere. Yellow fever they call it a couple of guys writting some chants and songs, everyone getting behind them and bugger me they have atmosphere . How hard is that? but no this could never happen at a rugby game everyone just sits there like dummys only clapping or cheering when something good happens. What happened to encouraging your team when they're down and most need it. We all need to buck up our ideas and become better supporters.
2. In this day and age people expect an entertainment package and i'm afraid they just ain't getting it. The unions need to take a look at American sport and provide not just a 80 minute game but a 2 to 3 hour entertainment package that appeals to all ages and sexes.
3. Lastly I think there is to much pandering to the corprates I know thats where a lot of the money comes from but most of them attend games for the food and piss and I would say a majority don't even watch the game but they get looked after whereas the real rugby fan who can only just afford to go along each week has to pay over the top prices for crap food no choice in beverages and if they do try to have fun over zealous security gaurds soon put pay to that. I hate to say it but after many years of loving to go to the rugby I now much prefer to get a few mates together and head to the pub where I know we can create an atmosphere."

Apparently I'm apathetic, but I couldn't care less.
"Being a Partick Thistle fan sets you apart. It means youre a free thinker. It also means your team has no money." Tim Luckhurst, The Independent, 4th December 2003
1. It really isnt a couple of guys writing songs. Most knew tunes from other footballing teams or backgrounds. Its really a bit of wit of many creating songs and the best ones stuck.
2. American football? Please. He's wanting to be more like YF but then suggests what the American's do?
...and Frankie putting them in to song books.

The Ruf, The Ruf, The Ruf is on Fire!!
Secondly, the sport is absolutely sh*te.
NRL I will watch - up the warriors
"In this day and age people expect an entertainment package and i'm afraid they just ain't getting it. The unions need to take a look at American sport and provide not just a 80 minute game but a 2 to 3 hour entertainment package that appeals to all ages and sexes. "
Apparently I'm apathetic, but I couldn't care less.
"Being a Partick Thistle fan sets you apart. It means youre a free thinker. It also means your team has no money." Tim Luckhurst, The Independent, 4th December 2003
I have to say there is quite a difference in atmosphere between Northern Hemisphere rugby crowds v Southern Hemisphere, but this is probably really only applicable to internationals, as I haven't been to much N Hemispher club rugby. Standing squashed together on the North Terrace at Lansdowne with 15,000 people singing Molly Malone is as good as any football crowd atmosphere I've ever been to.
Whearas the Waratahs & 'Canes games I've been to, have been comatosely boring places for atmosphere, I think the noise and singing created by the Lions fans during the tests here gives an idea of what atmosphere at rugby can be like, I just wished we had more of it.
When Hibs, went up, to win the Scottish Cup - I wisnae there - furfuxake!
I don't think anyone disputes the fact that the atmosphere at the football is better than at the Rugby, even the rugby fans are seeing it.
So surely we as supporters of the Phoenix should be encouraging the supporters of other sports to come and join us too! Instead we act like meatheads, insulting their sport and effectively calling them stupid for "standing in the rain and drinking cold beer", we're in danger of becoming an elitist bunch of snobs.
It's embarrassing.
"we're in danger of becoming" is a generalisation that doesn't stand up.
"we're in danger of becoming" is a generalisation that doesn't stand up.
"we're in danger of becoming" is a generalisation that doesn't stand up.
It's still a fraction of the 'Poofball' references on most union forums.
It's still a fraction of the 'Poofball' references on most union forums.
Looks like all that chanting practise has paid off!
You will notice that I rarely if ever contribute to any of these threads.
Apparently I'm apathetic, but I couldn't care less.
"Being a Partick Thistle fan sets you apart. It means youre a free thinker. It also means your team has no money." Tim Luckhurst, The Independent, 4th December 2003

Apparently I'm apathetic, but I couldn't care less.
"Being a Partick Thistle fan sets you apart. It means youre a free thinker. It also means your team has no money." Tim Luckhurst, The Independent, 4th December 2003
It's still a fraction of the 'Poofball' references on most union forums.
Founder
It's still a fraction of the 'Poofball' references on most union forums.
Game, Set and Match

Good call. Although, to be fair, sl*gging off rugby supporters is a bit like slashing the tyres on somebody's wheelchair. They're an easy target.Apparently I'm apathetic, but I couldn't care less.
"Being a Partick Thistle fan sets you apart. It means youre a free thinker. It also means your team has no money." Tim Luckhurst, The Independent, 4th December 2003
It's still a fraction of the 'Poofball' references on most union forums.
Good call. Although, to be fair, sl*gging off rugby supporters is a bit like slashing the tyres on somebody's wheelchair. They're an easy target.
Now I have to be very careful about how I say this, but I had a bit of a revelation at the weekend aided by a very good friend of mine.
My friend and I talked the week before about the respect referees are shown in rugby compared to football, my view has always been along the lines of my posting on this subject on this forum (Rugby has it right).
After the Hurricanes game on Saturday night, when in the last five minutes the ref seemed to lose the plot, I sat there glowing in my own self righteousness as the Hurricanes players accepted the decision, and acted in a very respectful way. The captain in the post match interview refused to criticise the ref and even said �he had a great game�.
�There�s the difference between rugby and football I was talking about the other night� I gloated to my mate.
�That�s what�s wrong with rugby� he answered straight back �If that were football and he was the captain the team I support, I�d be pissed off. He�s showing no passion, he�s not allowed to show any emotion. How can you expect the supporters to get behind a sport that regulates players emotions�
So I thought about it I kind of agree with him. So I was thinking that maybe a new rule this season could be that only the Captain is allowed to punch the ref?
While I�m on the subject, this country�s newspapers need to stop making excuses for its losing teams and using the referee as a scapegoat, just look at the Dom Post today and every paper for 3 months after the rugby world cup, it�s embarrassing. If the Hurricanes hadn�t played so crap for 79 minutes the iffy decision in the 80th minute wouldn�t have mattered. If the All Blacks had been a better team than France or thought about taking a drop goal then it would have been them that went on to lose to England in the semi's. Grow up.
Rant over!Now I have to be very careful about how I say this, but I had a bit of a revelation at the weekend aided by a very good friend of mine.
My friend and I talked the week before about the respect referees are shown in rugby compared to football, my view has always been along the lines of my posting on this subject on this forum (Rugby has it right).
After the Hurricanes game on Saturday night, when in the last five minutes the ref seemed to lose the plot, I sat there glowing in my own self righteousness as the Hurricanes players accepted the decision, and acted in a very respectful way. The captain in the post match interview refused to criticise the ref and even said �he had a great game�.
�There�s the difference between rugby and football I was talking about the other night� I gloated to my mate.
�That�s what�s wrong with rugby� he answered straight back �If that were football and he was the captain the team I support, I�d be pissed off. He�s showing no passion, he�s not allowed to show any emotion. How can you expect the supporters to get behind a sport that regulates players emotions�
So I thought about it I kind of agree with him. So I was thinking that maybe a new rule this season could be that only the Captain is allowed to punch the ref?
While I�m on the subject, this country�s newspapers need to stop making excuses for its losing teams and using the referee as a scapegoat, just look at the Dom Post today and every paper for 3 months after the rugby world cup, it�s embarrassing. If the Hurricanes hadn�t played so crap for 79 minutes the iffy decision in the 80th minute wouldn�t have mattered. If the All Blacks had been a better team than France or thought about taking a drop goal then it would have been them that went on to lose to England in the semi's. Grow up.
Rant over!
