it could have only been for a dangerous challenge (you'd hope it wasn't for DOGSO since a goal was given..). 50/50 is such a deceiving phrase. The striker won the ball, they were in possession. It wasn't a collision, it was a foul by the keeper. If that foul was dangerous, it would probably warrant a red card. Hard to say without having seen the actual challenge.
it could have only been for a dangerous challenge (you'd hope it wasn't for DOGSO since a goal was given..). 50/50 is such a deceiving phrase. The striker won the ball, they were on possession. It wasn't a collision, it was a foul by the keeper. If that foul was dangerous, it would probably warrant a red card. Hard to say without having seen the actual challenge.