Posted August 06, 2017 03:09 · last edited August 06, 2017 06:49
That is the perfect example of why the current interpretations are a crock of shark. By any sensible definition of the term active, Berisha had an active role in that, because by being there, he forced Muscat to lunge at the ball like that and slot it in the near post.
Alternatively, a lack of skill in muscat's attempt to clear the ball lead to the own goal; there had appears to be an onside player on the far side of the goalie, why should play have ceased if Berisha never became active?
That is the perfect example of why the current interpretations are a crock of shark. By any sensible definition of the term active, Berisha had an active role in that, because by being there, he forced Muscat to lunge at the ball like that and slot it in the near post.
Alternatively, a lack of skill in muscat's attempt to clear the ball lead to the own goal; there had appears to be an onside player on the far side of the goalie, why should have play ceased if Berisha never became active?
That is the perfect example of why the current interpretations are a crock of shark. By any sensible definition of the term active, Berisha had an active role in that, because by being there, he forced Muscat to lunge at the ball like that and slot it in the near post.
Alternatively, a lack of skill in muscat's attempt to clear the ball lead to the own goal; if there had been an onside player on the far side of the goalie, why should have play ceased if Berisha never became active?
