Post history

History for I'm not your Bro...

Cap Prem 2020

Back to topic

Current version

Posted July 22, 2017 19:20 · last edited July 22, 2017 19:41

Feverish wrote:

with the two title contenders still to play Olympic this is a decent reason not to have reserve sides in the top league

[/quote]

[quote=Global Game]

Your point is valid regarding Olympic and ability to influence the league. All I'm saying is that if they play within the rules, fine. If you don't like the rules, change them.

Only two title contenders ?

With both also having to play Lower Hutt who will also likely strengthen, (plus Integration Works Waterside Karori history of being chokers ;-)) I wouldn't discount Ngatiawa Russell Lodge NW just yet.

The reserves teams of Lower Hutt, Wests, Olympic have been influencing the promotion/relegation prospects of all clubs throughout the Season so if within the rules not an issue.

edit: must recognize sponsors !

Previous versions

4 versions

Unknown editor edited July 22, 2017 19:41

Feverish wrote:

with the two title contenders still to play Olympic this is a decent reason not to have reserve sides in the top league

[/quote]

[quote=Global Game]

Your point is valid regarding Olympic and ability to influence the league. All I'm saying is that if they play within the rules, fine. If you don't like the rules, change them.

Only two title contenders ?

The reserves teams of Lower Hutt, Wests, Olympic have been influencing the promotion/relegation prospects of all clubs throughout the Season so if within the rules not an issue.

edit: must recognize sponsors !

Unknown editor edited July 22, 2017 19:26

Feverish wrote:

with the two title contenders still to play Olympic this is a decent reason not to have reserve sides in the top league

[/quote]

[quote=Global Game]

Your point is valid regarding Olympic and ability to influence the league. All I'm saying is that if they play within the rules, fine. If you don't like the rules, change them.

Only two title contenders ?

With both also having to play Lower Hutt who will also likely strengthen, (plus Karori history of being chokers ;-)) I wouldn't discount North Wellington just yet.

The reserves teams of Lower Hutt, Wests, Olympic have been influencing the promotion/relegation prospects of all clubs throughout the Season so if within the rules not an issue.

Unknown editor edited July 22, 2017 19:22

Feverish wrote:

with the two title contenders still to play Olympic this is a decent reason not to have reserve sides in the top league

[/quote]

[quote=Global Game]

Your point is valid regarding Olympic and ability to influence the league. All I'm saying is that if they play within the rules, fine. If you don't like the rules, change them.

Only two title contenders ?

With both also having to play Lower Hutt who will likely strengthen, (plus Karori history of being chokers ;-)) I wouldn't discount North Wellington just yet.

The reserves teams of Lower Hutt, Wests, Olympic have been influencing the promotion/relegation prospects of all clubs throughout the Season so if within the rules not an issue.

Unknown editor edited July 22, 2017 19:21

Feverish wrote:

with the two title contenders still to play Olympic this is a decent reason not to have reserve sides in the top league

[/quote]

[quote=Global Game]

Your point is valid regarding Olympic and ability to influence the league. All I'm saying is that if they play within the rules, fine. If you don't like the rules, change them.

Only two title contenders ?

With both also having to play Lower Hutt who will likely strengthen to influence their own relegation prospects, (plus Karori history of being chokers ;-)) I wouldn't discount North Wellington just yet.

The reserves teams of Lower Hutt, Wests, Olympic have been influencing the promotion/relegation prospects of all clubs throughout the Season so if within the rules not an issue.