Post history

History for Teza

Capital 1

Back to topic

Current version

Posted October 01, 2013 20:45 · last edited October 02, 2013 08:42

Feverish wrote:
Teza wrote:
Smithy wrote:
Stefan wrote:

Seems a bit unfair to put the mistake under the name CF.

When both mistakes (Cap 1 re-grading & Eastbourne U17) have been made by a specific person...

JC


Yeah that's a load of bollocks really. The rules are horrendous, and need a total rewrite. I honestly don't know who wrote them, but they should be shot.

I believe that particular rule is to be rewritten for next season.

My personal opinion is that the rule as it stands at the moment is black and white with no ambiguity about it at all.

Which is what?

I'll just say that from my perspective the intent of a rule doesn’t triumph over the rule as written.  

Previous versions

3 versions
Teza edited October 02, 2013 08:42
Feverish wrote:
Teza wrote:
Smithy wrote:
Stefan wrote:

Seems a bit unfair to put the mistake under the name CF.

When both mistakes (Cap 1 re-grading & Eastbourne U17) have been made by a specific person...

JC


Yeah that's a load of bollocks really. The rules are horrendous, and need a total rewrite. I honestly don't know who wrote them, but they should be shot.

I believe that particular rule is to be rewritten for next season.

My personal opinion is that the rule as it stands at the moment is black and white with no ambiguity about it at all.

Which is what?

I'll just say that from my perspective the intent of a rule doesn’t triumph over the rule as written.  I can't really comment further for legal reasons. :)

Teza edited October 01, 2013 20:46
Feverish wrote:
Teza wrote:
Smithy wrote:
Stefan wrote:

Seems a bit unfair to put the mistake under the name CF.

When both mistakes (Cap 1 re-grading & Eastbourne U17) have been made by a specific person...

JC


Yeah that's a load of bollocks really. The rules are horrendous, and need a total rewrite. I honestly don't know who wrote them, but they should be shot.

I believe that particular rule is to be rewritten for next season.

My personal opinion is that the rule as it stands at the moment is black and white with no ambiguity about it at all.

Which is what?

I'll just say that from my perspective the intent of a rule doesn’t triumph over the rule as written.  I Can't really comment further for legal reasons. :)

Teza edited October 01, 2013 20:45
Feverish wrote:
Teza wrote:
Smithy wrote:
Stefan wrote:

Seems a bit unfair to put the mistake under the name CF.

When both mistakes (Cap 1 re-grading & Eastbourne U17) have been made by a specific person...

JC


Yeah that's a load of bollocks really. The rules are horrendous, and need a total rewrite. I honestly don't know who wrote them, but they should be shot.

I believe that particular rule is to be rewritten for next season.

My personal opinion is that the rule as it stands at the moment is black and white with no ambiguity about it at all.

Which is what?

I'll just say from my perspective the intent of a rule doesn’t triumph over the rule as written.  I Can't really comment further for legal reasons. :)