Post history

History for Teza

Capital 1

Back to topic

Current version

Posted October 01, 2013 21:23 · last edited October 02, 2013 08:43

Mossimo wrote:
Teza wrote:
Feverish wrote:
Teza wrote:
Smithy wrote:
Stefan wrote:

Seems a bit unfair to put the mistake under the name CF.

When both mistakes (Cap 1 re-grading & Eastbourne U17) have been made by a specific person...

JC


Yeah that's a load of bollocks really. The rules are horrendous, and need a total rewrite. I honestly don't know who wrote them, but they should be shot.

I believe that particular rule is to be rewritten for next season.

My personal opinion is that the rule as it stands at the moment is black and white with no ambiguity about it at all.

Which is what?

I'll just say that from my perspective the intent of a rule doesn’t triumph over the rule as written.  I can't really comment further for legal reasons. :)

This is rediculous. Get over yourselves, At the end of the day/season you find yourselves at the wrong end of the table.Instead of looking to blame everybody else for this and that indiscression.(Which shouldn't happen but does) Accept that your team just wasn't at the right end of the table and shit happens.Dust yourselves off and sort the team out,so you are at the right end of the table next year.If you had been better you wouldnt have been there in the first place.Stop the wingeing.

If every club starts bringing lawyers and legal battles in.Football becomes a joke....

Suck it up and move on.

We dont want/need an11 team league next year!





 

Previous versions

1 version
Teza edited October 02, 2013 08:43
Mossimo wrote:
Teza wrote:
Feverish wrote:
Teza wrote:
Smithy wrote:
Stefan wrote:

Seems a bit unfair to put the mistake under the name CF.

When both mistakes (Cap 1 re-grading & Eastbourne U17) have been made by a specific person...

JC


Yeah that's a load of bollocks really. The rules are horrendous, and need a total rewrite. I honestly don't know who wrote them, but they should be shot.

I believe that particular rule is to be rewritten for next season.

My personal opinion is that the rule as it stands at the moment is black and white with no ambiguity about it at all.

Which is what?

I'll just say that from my perspective the intent of a rule doesn’t triumph over the rule as written.  I can't really comment further for legal reasons. :)

This is rediculous. Get over yourselves, At the end of the day/season you find yourselves at the wrong end of the table.Instead of looking to blame everybody else for this and that indiscression.(Which shouldn't happen but does) Accept that your team just wasn't at the right end of the table and shit happens.Dust yourselves off and sort the team out,so you are at the right end of the table next year.If you had been better you wouldnt have been there in the first place.Stop the wingeing.

If every club starts bringing lawyers and legal battles in.Football becomes a joke....

Suck it up and move on.

We dont want/need an11 team league next year!

Settle down a bit big boy, take a breath and notice the little smiley at the end of the comment. Just in case you still don't get it......it was a joke comment (I thought it was obvious but it must have been more subtle than I thought).