Posted May 09, 2016 10:04 · last edited May 09, 2016 10:06
so it's ok to bend the rules, as long as you're using pokie money (which takes money from people who can't afford it) to do it, but not if you're using money from a consortium of millionaires (who can clearly afford to do it)?
That is an ethically interesting stance you take.
That is also assuming WU/nix are bending the rules.
so it's ok to bend the rules, as long as you're using pokie money (which takes money from people who can't afford it) to do it, but not if you're using money from a consortium of millionaires (who can clearly afford to do it)?
That is an ethically interesting stance you take.
so it's ok to bend the rules, as long as you're using pokie money (which takes money from people who can't afford it) to do it, but not if you're using money from a consortium of millionaires (who can clearly afford to do it)?
That is an ethically strange stance you take.