Posted August 13, 2013 00:24 · last edited August 13, 2013 00:41
No, they don't. They have an U17 side that is stacked full of players who are too old to be in the league and without whom they would not have a team at all.
Really... that's classic. Rather spoils the optimism of the piece in the Herald.
From the paper:
While the Eastbourne Football
Club continues to wrestle with issues around its administrative future,its prospects on the field look bright with the performances this season of its first-ever under-17 team.
No, they don't. They have an U17 side that is stacked full of players who are too old to be in the league and without whom they would not have a team at all.[/quote]
Really... that's classic. Rather spoils the optimism of the piece in the Herald.
[quote]
While the Eastbourne Football
Club continues to wrestle wit hissues around its administrative future,its prospects on the field
look bright with the performances this season of its first-ever under-17 team.
No, they don't. They have an U17 side that is stacked full of players who are too old to be in the league and without whom they would not have a team at all.
Really... that's classic. Rather spoils the optimism of the piece in the Herald.
[quote]
While the Eastbourne Football
Club continues to wrestle wit hissues around its administrative future,its prospects on the field
look bright with the performances this season of its first-ever under-17 team.
No, they don't. They have an U17 side that is stacked full of players who are too old to be in the league and without whom they would not have a team at all.
Really... that's classic. Rather spoils the optimism of the piece in the Herald.
No, they don't. They have an U17 side that is stacked full of players who are too old to be in the league and without whom they would not have a team at all.
Really... that's classic. Rather spoils the optimism of the piece in the Herald.