Regional Football - powered by Park Life

Jack McKnight Jnr Champs 2013

59 replies · 16,754 views
over 12 years ago

Underway today for the 42nd year here in Nelson.  Cheers Nelson Bays Football.  Pitches are awesome - good vibe between teams.  Coaches even have technical areas!!  Teams that are smoking after day 1 - Nelson, Selwyn, FC Twenty 11 and Cashmere.

Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago

this is the 10th Grade comp?

Mainland no show so a couple of clubs sent there first teams up from Chch.

E's Flat Ah's Flat Too

Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago

I have never heard of this tournament? Is there a website or some more info you can give the world?

Incredible stamina. No shame. Yellow Fever.

Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago

Only this Smitty:  http://www.stuff.co.nz/nelson-mail/sport/9225801/Nelson-sides-great-starters-in-tournament.  Its a great old tournie most of the coaches can remember playing in it.....  M'boy's team just bundled out on penalties..tears and heartbroken 10 year olds.

Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago

It is better for youngsters to play extra time (sudden death if time is short) and to count corners in extra time. The brilliant Coastlands Cup for juniors run by Raumati Hearts for many years counted corners and it was much fairer and better and less tense for kids than a penalty shoot. Lest anyone think the idea of corners comes from Mars or Uranus, let me tell you it was used in the Chatham Cup (no kidding, it's true) up to about 1960.

Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago

I recognise this name. Played in it for Wellington about 25 years ago. 

(Also lost the final of the coastlands cup with Karori hornets when our player didn't know the corner rule and played it out when he didn't need to)

Founder

Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago · edited over 12 years ago · History

Karori Swifts players with the Coastlands Cup which was not actually a cup. Can you spot a future All White?


Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago

The dog?

Founder

Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago

How good is that Road Duel tee shirt in the back. And the barnet back left.

Incredible stamina. No shame. Yellow Fever.

Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago · edited over 12 years ago · History

Appalling showing by Canterbury's teams in the 11s. With the numbers they have at their disposal they should win that tournament (or make the final) every year.

What's going on with that? 

Very few parents happy with the standard of coaching. A lot of players looking like they shouldn't be there.

Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago

The dog played left wing. Scored 4 goals and 10 assists most seasons. The future AW is in blue with bare feet in front row -- Duncan Oughton. The dog's owner today is a prominent heart surgeon (true). 

Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago
Loftus Road wrote:

The dog played left wing. Scored 4 goals and 10 assists most seasons. The future AW is in blue with bare feet in front row -- Duncan Oughton. The dog's owner today is a prominent heart surgeon (true). 


Awww. He looked like such a nice lad. Time's caught up with him ;)

Incredible stamina. No shame. Yellow Fever.

Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago

Appalling showing by Canterbury's teams. With the numbers they have at their disposal they should win that tournament (or make the final) every year.

What's going on with that? 

Very few parents happy with the standard of coaching. A lot of players looking like they shouldn't be there.


Mainland never select Canterbury A, B, C teams for this tournament. Just random squads from those selected at trials, and probably only 3-4 weeks of training.

Kotahitanga. We are one.

Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago


Two appleton brothers in that photo....Must be mixed  years. I thought they were called the Royals (As a swift member myself)

Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago · edited over 12 years ago · History

Well spotted. Karori won two grades at Coastlands that year so the boys in the photo are from two years/teams. The trophy was awarded on results in six age grades. 

Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago · edited over 12 years ago · History

Hi Stretford. Yes I know that they don't select A, B and C squads (which I agree with btw). The previous years' squads have still been far superior in terms of quality, despite the short coaching period. They were better players to start with...

You can still get teams playing good football in such a short period of time if you actually know how to coach.I suggest there are serious issues with the selection process and the quality of the coaches.

Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago

Hi Stretford. Yes I know that they don't select A, B and C squads (which I agree with btw). The previous years' squads have still been far superior in terms of quality, despite the short coaching period. They were better players to start with...

You can still get teams playing good football in such a short period of time if you actually know how to coach.I suggest there are serious issues with the selection process and the quality of the coaches.



no need to mince your words!

E's Flat Ah's Flat Too

Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago

Hi Foal30

Oh I'm quite capable of being polite, but polite is what you do around your grandmother, not when you need something done.

Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago

one of the 4 11th Grade Coaches I don't know/ have never worked with

1 of the 4 teams coaches is exactly the sort of young guys we need to bring in. No pick my son BS or club allegiance hang-ups.

1 of the Coaches is the FDO for the 2nd biggest club in the city and reserve/assistant coach for the Dragons!  So I'm interested in how one would go about up-skilling Tetso.





E's Flat Ah's Flat Too

Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago

It's probably fair to say player quality does vary from year to year but is seldom overtly noticeable. Do you really think this years selected 11's were that poor?

E's Flat Ah's Flat Too

Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago

Yes, I know Tetso, but not very well. Very nice, knowledgeable guy. I'd simply caution anyone that the skills required to coach seniors aren't necessarily what's required to coach juniors, unfortunately. There's more to coaching than just knowing a bunch of football stuff, otherwise every internet browser could become a top coach. I have several friends who do well as senior coaches but couldn't coach little kids to save themselves. I also know coaches in the reverse situation.

You also have to have the ability to relate to the age-group you're dealing with. I don't know, maybe Tetso can do it, maybe not. I haven't seen any of his sessions so I can't really say.

In the end, qualifications are simply proof you passed a course at one time.

Yes, it is quite noticeable this year. 

The selection process is completely flawed for a start. Small-Sided Games are insufficient to give a complete understanding of a player's abilities are. They're an essential component for sure, but many technically-excellent children do not show up well in SSGs because they're small or weak. Some kids who play well in SSGs do so because they're bigger/faster/stronger due to the Relative Age Effect (where a 1st Quarter baby can be up to 11 months older than a 4th - a huge development gap at that age), but technically they're quite poor. I see this all the time on Saturdays. But the Big Kids 'win games' so everybody's blinded to the reality. And we lose the best players because we're obssessed with winning as the only measure of success.

Professional academies also rely on a pure technical assessment, as well as several conditioned SSGs. 

This gives them a much broader picture of the player and helps eliminate the tendency to just pick the big/fast/strong 'winners'.

It's not difficult to do, it just takes a little more time. Mainland have paid staff. Why aren't they doing this? Or training others to do it?

Where's the NZF player profile? The WOFP has been out for a couple of years now. Surely someone's had time to at least come up with an idea? Why is one kid picked over another?

It's all just opinions at the moment, and you know what they say about opinions...


Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago

So I guess your son/daughter didn't get in then. That is probably disappointing for them, but it doesn't mean the process is flawed. It just means your child isn't good enough. And as your child cannot possibly be your grandmother, you might consider telling them the truth rather than being polite or diplomatic.


Let us know how that conversation goes yeah?

You can ascertain what your opponent is afraid of by observing the means by which he attempts to frighten you



Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago
shushy6 wrote:

So I guess your son/daughter didn't get in then. That is probably disappointing for them, but it doesn't mean the process is flawed. It just means your child isn't good enough. And as your child cannot possibly be your grandmother, you might consider telling them the truth rather than being polite or diplomatic.


Let us know how that conversation goes yeah?


Ha! Brutal, but probably accurate. That was a load of BS. It's pretty effective picking players from small sided games. I'm not sure what a "pure technical assessment" would look like but sounds pretty ridiculous.

Incredible stamina. No shame. Yellow Fever.

Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago


Wow. Totally missed this thread.

Are we seriously arguing over 10th grade coaching, selection and players?

Things are dire indeed.

I let my guitar speak for me

Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago

Actually he did get in, so that wrecks your argument entirely. The process is still flawed. I said 'flawed', not ENTIRELY WRONG.

If you don't know what a 'technical assessment' looks like you're better off not discussing coaching, because a coach would know what one is.

And VimFiego, yes we are - it's a good time to start getting things rightOr do we wait until 15th grade or maybe seniors to start doing things properly?

Overseas the top clubs select from six years old and they're turning out more top players than we are.

Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago

Heh. Okay. I stand corrected.

Incredible stamina. No shame. Yellow Fever.

Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago
VimFuego wrote:


Wow. Totally missed this thread.

Are we seriously arguing over 10th grade coaching, selection and players?

Things are dire indeed.

Off season +Football tragics = forum banter

Kotahitanga. We are one.

Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago
Smithy wrote:
shushy6 wrote:

So I guess your son/daughter didn't get in then. That is probably disappointing for them, but it doesn't mean the process is flawed. It just means your child isn't good enough. And as your child cannot possibly be your grandmother, you might consider telling them the truth rather than being polite or diplomatic.


Let us know how that conversation goes yeah?


Ha! Brutal, but probably accurate. That was a load of BS. It's pretty effective picking players from small sided games. I'm not sure what a "pure technical assessment" would look like but sounds pretty ridiculous.

SSGs are perfect for developing a technical assessment of a player. Easy to see a players ball control, vision and awareness, passing accuracy, dribbling ability, creativity, pass and move awareness, body shape for receiving and turning, proactive defending and passing. As it's a SSG there should only be 4-5 players per team so everyone should get plenty of touches. 

Kotahitanga. We are one.

Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago · edited over 12 years ago · History
Some kids who play well in SSGs do so because they're bigger/faster/stronger due to the Relative Age Effect (where a 1st Quarter baby can be up to 11 months older than a 4th - a huge development gap at that age), but technically they're quite poor. I see this all the time on Saturdays.

It's all just opinions at the moment, and you know what they say about opinions...


Just returned from that tourny.  Final was between Otago and Nelson - BIG kids on display.  Thought I was watching a 13th grade game.  Neither team had a creative player, rather two defences just cancelled each other out.  Had expected to see an end to end final game, as in the past.

Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago
Smithy wrote:
I'm not sure what a "pure technical assessment" would look like but sounds pretty ridiculous.
Don't do much coaching then, huh?
Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago
SSGs are perfect for developing a technical assessment of a player. Easy to see a players ball control, vision and awareness, passing accuracy, dribbling ability, creativity, pass and move awareness, body shape for receiving and turning, proactive defending and passing. As it's a SSG there should only be 4-5 players per team so everyone should get plenty of touches. 


What happens when 1-2 players completely dominate the game?  See that often in pre-season kids training.  The SSG is taken over by a dominant kid, not necessarily the best player, but they are physically dominant with a high work rate and lots of speed.  The games are a good indicator but a technical assessment can determine whether the kids can actually complete all of the skills you describe.  Yes, some kids can do it in a game situation, whereas others may not be as far along in their development and need a less pressured arena to shine.
Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago

tell those dominant kids to play 2 touch

Kotahitanga. We are one.

Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago
tell those dominant kids to play 2 touch


Agree.  However I see many coaches dismissing all but the dominant kid as 'unable to play/compete'.  Yet the dominant kid is not technically superior, just bigger and stronger.
Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago

Coach the coaches.

Kotahitanga. We are one.

Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago

Coach the coaches.


Exactly.  Who will do that then?  Not the federation.  Too busy on counting the money from the FTC.
Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago

Clubs should be coaching their own coaches (working in conjunction with FDOs). Feck, i sound like a Mainland staffer.

Kotahitanga. We are one.

Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago · edited over 12 years ago · History
Clubs should be coaching their own coaches (working in conjunction with FDOs). Feck, i sound like a Mainland staffer.

How many clubs are doing that?  Most clubs are crying out for coaches, and the 'Pub Club's' regard them as little more than child minders.  Some clubs are getting organised but they are a minority.  Mainland - the only way through that door is to be a failed import.

Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago
Clubs should be coaching their own coaches (working in conjunction with FDOs). Feck, i sound like a Mainland staffer.

How many clubs are doing that?  Most clubs are crying out for coaches, and the 'Pub Club's' regard them as little more than child minders.  Some clubs are getting organised but they are a minority.  Mainland - the only way through that door is to be a failed import.


I would be pretty confident that Korosh is not a failure, "Alan". Xavier also is a fantastically qualified coach and the region is bloody lucky to have them here!
And if you find yourself wondering why the door there keeps getting slammed in your face, you might consider taking a bit of a look at yourself. All I have seen in the 4 hours you have been on here has been moaning, criticism and borderline racism/xenophobia. Perhaps you can do a better job than the current crop of clearly terrible ex players? If you think so, then apply. Be sure and bring your NZ equivalent of a UEFA "A" badge, a positive attitude, and your friend "Beckham" to hold your hand eh?
P.S. I am also employed by Mainland, and I have only ever been outside NZ twice, so what does that make me? I seriously cant WAIT to hear your reply. 

You can ascertain what your opponent is afraid of by observing the means by which he attempts to frighten you



Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago

Actually he did get in, so that wrecks your argument entirely. 


Well done. How did he go?

You can ascertain what your opponent is afraid of by observing the means by which he attempts to frighten you



Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago
Smithy wrote:
I'm not sure what a "pure technical assessment" would look like but sounds pretty ridiculous.
Don't do much coaching then, huh?

Not heaps, no. 
Incidentally, we have some clever tools that tell us when two accounts are being operated by the same person...

Incredible stamina. No shame. Yellow Fever.

Permalink Permalink