All for players playing at the right level of competition, but think of the bigger long term picture. Clubs, not individual teams.
'Random teams' are just that, and you got to ask how they come about and how sustainable they are.
Large well run clubs do not have random teams ( setting myself up for smart comments here..fire away!). They grade players into a number of suitable teams they have in various divisions. They offer stability in competitions. More players join, they enter another team in the lowest division, and the quality works it's way up the divisions. As players leave, the opposite happens and the teams gradually relegate to lower divisions. A smoothing effect rather than extreme changes season on season.
So what happens if random teams (irrespective of how they came to life, and I know there is a case for Burwood going back to the failed u23 league) are given slots in an equally random unsupported fashion. Here one year gone the next.
A good response, but one thing I've noticed is that a lot of these Larger run clubs have a habit of pulling in these better players from the 'smaller' clubs which does not help them to establish teams at a higher level.
A lot of this starts happening at Junior Level with 'poaching' of rep players etc, but similar things happen at the higher levels too but in a different way.
It also doesn't help with clubs merging and effectively being 2 or 3 clubs against 1. In the end this is going to lead to 'smaller' clubs struggling to maintain their identity, yet these clubs are needed to avoid repetitive matches