Post history

History for AllWhites82

Mainland Premier League (Part 2)

Back to topic

Current version

Posted August 01, 2016 09:33 · last edited March 18, 2021 06:12


[/quote]

My $0.02's worth:

The problem in sourcing the majority of the CU squad from the MPL is that the MPL is a poor quality environment for developing players good enough to mount a serious challenge for the title. If mere participation is the goal, then source from the MPL by all means but the

[/quote]

Thankfully there is now noise coming form some of the FootballSouth Clubs calling for the return of the South Island League. At the time local Christchurch clubs voted to stop the SIL I can recall some saying the money they saved would be put into better training resources to develop players, sadly there has been little evidence of this.

[/quote]

Is this direct from the clubs or just key board warriors?

Which clubs down south can afford to enter an SIL with more than one game?

[/quote]

From the clubs, heard this from several sources down there. Clubs asking the FootballSouth Fed to start talking to Mainland Fed to look at returning to a SIL, they know the money is an issue but they what to start the dialogue, which is a big change from the past. Some even asking why the Fed is pumping money (which is the clubs money) into the Southern United  National League side and would that money be better spent on a travelling league.    

Previous versions

2 versions
Unknown editor edited March 18, 2021 06:12


[/quote]

My $0.02's worth:

The problem in sourcing the majority of the CU squad from the MPL is that the MPL is a poor quality environment for developing players good enough to mount a serious challenge for the title. If mere participation is the goal, then source from the MPL by all means but the

[/quote]

Thankfully there is now noise coming form some of the FootballSouth Clubs calling for the return of the South Island League. At the time local Christchurch clubs voted to stop the SIL I can recall some saying the money they saved would be put into better training resources to develop players, sadly there has been little evidence of this.

[/quote]

Is this direct from the clubs or just key board warriors?

Which clubs down south can afford to enter an SIL with more than one game?

[/quote]

From the clubs, heard this from several sources down there. Clubs asking the FootballSouth Fed to start talking to Mainland Fed to look at returning to a SIL, they know the money is an issue but they what to start the dialogue, which is a big change from the past. Some even asking why the Fed is pumping money (which is the clubs money) into the Southern United  National League side and would that money be better spent on a travelling league.    

AllWhites82 edited August 01, 2016 11:15


[/quote]

My $0.02's worth:

The problem in sourcing the majority of the CU squad from the MPL is that the MPL is a poor quality environment for developing players good enough to mount a serious challenge for the title. If mere participation is the goal, then source from the MPL by all means but the

[/quote]

Thankfully there is now noise coming form some of the FootballSouth Clubs calling for the return of the South Island League. At the time local Christchurch clubs voted to stop the SIL I can recall some saying the money they saved would be put into better training resources to develop players, sadly there has been little evidence of this.

[/quote]

Is this direct from the clubs or just key board warriors?

Which clubs down south can afford to enter an SIL with more than one game?

[/quote]

From the clubs, heard this from several sources down there. Clubs asking the FootballSouth Fed to start talking to Mainland Fed to look at returning to a SIL, they know the money is an issue but they what to start the dialogue, which is a big change from the past. Some even asking why the Feb is pumping money (which is the clubs money) into the Southern United  National League side and would that money be better spent on a travelling league.