Post history

History for foal30

Mainland Premier League (Part 2)

Back to topic

Current version

Posted April 25, 2017 11:46 · last edited March 18, 2021 06:12

Ronaldoknow wrote:
Steptoe wrote:
VimFuego wrote:
Just heard that FC2011 have lost pints for illegal player. Does mean Coastal aren't top after the first round.... How hard is it to keep track of who is playing ffs!
If Anton has been on the team card for all 7 of FC's matches and the standard penalties are applied, the table would be as follows:

What I find difficult to understand with all of this is given the several thousand dollars each club pays to be in the league why aren't all registrations checked before the season starts? What is the entry fee for? In the days of CFA volunteers all cards in all grades (junior and senior) were checked every week. Why has it taken 7 rounds to discover this? If this is a genuine mistake of process make the punishment fit the crime - fine FC and sack the Mainland staff responsible for overseeing admin! Couldn't be any worse without them.

Last season a Youth D1 Grade winning side used a player in every round despite it actuall saying on the Mainland Website **** ***** is not allowed to play. So maybe the checks are only when another club rings up and complains.

Why should CTFC  miss out on +6 goals? That's bullshark for sure. 

Previous versions

1 version
Unknown editor edited March 18, 2021 06:12
Ronaldoknow wrote:
Steptoe wrote:
VimFuego wrote:
Just heard that FC2011 have lost pints for illegal player. Does mean Coastal aren't top after the first round.... How hard is it to keep track of who is playing ffs!
If Anton has been on the team card for all 7 of FC's matches and the standard penalties are applied, the table would be as follows:

What I find difficult to understand with all of this is given the several thousand dollars each club pays to be in the league why aren't all registrations checked before the season starts? What is the entry fee for? In the days of CFA volunteers all cards in all grades (junior and senior) were checked every week. Why has it taken 7 rounds to discover this? If this is a genuine mistake of process make the punishment fit the crime - fine FC and sack the Mainland staff responsible for overseeing admin! Couldn't be any worse without them.

Last season a Youth D1 Grade winning side used a player in every round despite it actuall saying on the Mainland Website **** ***** is not allowed to play. So maybe the checks are only when another club rings up and complains.

Why should CTFC  miss out on +6 goals? That's bullshark for sure.