Post history

History for Ronaldoknow

Mainland Premier League (Part 2)

Back to topic

Current version

Posted April 28, 2017 10:09 · last edited March 18, 2021 06:12

inafoxhole wrote:
Ronaldoknow wrote:
inafoxhole wrote:
Scottie Rd wrote:

Agree with you.

Let the results stand make it a fine of $2k for each and every breach.

Put the fines money in a kitty to be split at the end of season by the non offending clubs in the league concerned. 

Coaching staff at some clubs must be over worked if they can't spend two minutes checking new players details.

When you think about it, fines do more damage than result changes.

Pourquoi?

Was Scottie Rd suggesting FC 2011 get pinged $2k for every game this bloke played in? Or just once for the one misregistration? Either way, that's a heavier cost than losing points on the table, even if it leads to relegation. I think player/squad management on a fed level leaves a lot to be desired, as an aside.

To me the points deduction and score change is not an equitable solution as it negatively affects clubs not directly involved in those games. The rule is there to stop clubs from benefiting from scurrilous behavior, but the outcome is the opposing side benefits. You could hardly call what happened with FC cheating? Scottie's proposal only affects the club that committed the crime which is as it should be surely? None of the clubs that lost points could reasonably cry foul over playing against a player that they may have met in the league last year? 

If a fine is not an agreeable solution why not just take the points off them? I fail to see why the opposition should benefit, it doesn't make sense. Where did this idea that reversing the score to a 3-0 loss even come from? To me it has no basis as a justifiable solution to an administrative error.

Previous versions

3 versions
Unknown editor edited March 18, 2021 06:12
inafoxhole wrote:
Ronaldoknow wrote:
inafoxhole wrote:
Scottie Rd wrote:

Agree with you.

Let the results stand make it a fine of $2k for each and every breach.

Put the fines money in a kitty to be split at the end of season by the non offending clubs in the league concerned. 

Coaching staff at some clubs must be over worked if they can't spend two minutes checking new players details.

When you think about it, fines do more damage than result changes.

Pourquoi?

Was Scottie Rd suggesting FC 2011 get pinged $2k for every game this bloke played in? Or just once for the one misregistration? Either way, that's a heavier cost than losing points on the table, even if it leads to relegation. I think player/squad management on a fed level leaves a lot to be desired, as an aside.

To me the points deduction and score change is not an equitable solution as it negatively affects clubs not directly involved in those games. The rule is there to stop clubs from benefiting from scurrilous behavior, but the outcome is the opposing side benefits. You could hardly call what happened with FC cheating? Scottie's proposal only affects the club that committed the crime which is as it should be surely? None of the clubs that lost points could reasonably cry foul over playing against a player that they may have met in the league last year? 

If a fine is not an agreeable solution why not just take the points off them? I fail to see why the opposition should benefit, it doesn't make sense. Where did this idea that reversing the score to a 3-0 loss even come from? To me it has no basis as a justifiable solution to an administrative error.

Unknown editor edited April 28, 2017 10:19
inafoxhole wrote:
Ronaldoknow wrote:
inafoxhole wrote:
Scottie Rd wrote:

Agree with you.

Let the results stand make it a fine of $2k for each and every breach.

Put the fines money in a kitty to be split at the end of season by the non offending clubs in the league concerned. 

Coaching staff at some clubs must be over worked if they can't spend two minutes checking new players details.

When you think about it, fines do more damage than result changes.

Pourquoi?

Was Scottie Rd suggesting FC 2011 get pinged $2k for every game this bloke played in? Or just once for the one misregistration? Either way, that's a heavier cost than losing points on the table, even if it leads to relegation. I think player/squad management on a fed level leaves a lot to be desired, as an aside.

To me the points deduction and score change is not an equitable solution as it negatively affects clubs not directly involved in those games. The rule is there to stop clubs from benefiting from scurrilous behavior, but the outcome is the opposing side benefits. You could hardly call what happened with FC cheating? Scottie's proposal only affects the club that committed the crime which is as it should be surely? None of the clubs that lost points could reasonably cry foul over playing against a player that they may have met in the league last year? 
Unknown editor edited April 28, 2017 10:15
inafoxhole wrote:
Ronaldoknow wrote:
inafoxhole wrote:
Scottie Rd wrote:

Agree with you.

Let the results stand make it a fine of $2k for each and every breach.

Put the fines money in a kitty to be split at the end of season by the non offending clubs in the league concerned. 

Coaching staff at some clubs must be over worked if they can't spend two minutes checking new players details.

When you think about it, fines do more damage than result changes.

Pourquoi?

Was Scottie Rd suggesting FC 2011 get pinged $2k for every game this bloke played in? Or just once for the one misregistration? Either way, that's a heavier cost than losing points on the table, even if it leads to relegation. I think player/squad management on a fed level leaves a lot to be desired, as an aside.

To me the points deduction and score change is not an equitable solution as it affects clubs not directly involved in those games. Scottie's proposal only affects the club that committed the crime which is as it should be surely. None of the clubs that lost points could cry foul surely over playing against a player that they may have met in the league last year? On that point would it be more relevant that the player is registered to play in the league rather than for a club per se and transfers are only relevant if you are new to the league rather than the club?