He's not the only one that has trouble following the
thread.
The availability of paid full time coaching staff is
irrelevant to bobdylan's point, which I agree with, that if clubs
would stop fretting over "losing" "their" players and link up with
schools (a la Wests and HIBS) then the world would be a much
happier place.
This whole debate really boils down to clubs being afraid of
change.
Now before you go off at me I don't really agree with the
system but surely there's a case for making it work, at least in
the medium term, rather than thrasing about getting upset about
something that isn't likely to change in the near future?
smithy246 wrote:
He makes a reasonable point.
Unreasonable.
Stokes Valley, Naenae, Wainui, Petone for example dont have
full time paid coaches on staff like some other clubs do. Some
schools ie: St Pats, St Bernards, Chilton, Scared Heart, St
Orans draw kids from a large area and dont as such have a
local club. There are schools that some clubs would like to
associate with more than others, like Lower Hutt help out St Pats
(even though its in U/hutt). Who supplies coaches to Taita, Naenae,
St Bernards. On the other other hand I'm sure Stop Out/Lower Hutt/
Petone would all like to get exclusive rights to Hutt Valley
High.
Incredible stamina. No shame. Yellow Fever.