Current version

Posted January 22, 2025 10:25 · last edited January 22, 2025 10:27

It's a foul, but if Elliot stays on his feet and defends instead of going down when he doesn't have to then there's no goal. Should know by now you can't rely on the refs.

AFC just switch off for a moment and it cost them that second goal.

Probably deserve that equaliser though, how is no one marking Rogerson there?

Previous versions

4 versions
Unknown editor edited January 22, 2025 10:27
It's a foul, but if Elliot stays on his feet and defends instead of going down when he doesn't have to then there's no goal. Should know by now you can't rely on the refs.

AFC just switch off for a moment and it cost them that second goal.

Probably deserve that equaliser too, how is no one marking Rogerson there?
Unknown editor edited January 22, 2025 10:27
It's a foul, but if Elliot stays on his feet and defends instead of going down when he doesn't have to then there's no goal. Should know by now you can't rely on the refs.

AFC just switch off for a moment and it cost them that second goal.
Unknown editor edited January 22, 2025 10:26
It's a foul, but if Elliot stays on his feet and defends instead of going down when he doesn't have to then there's no goal. Should know by now you can't rely on the refs.

AFC just switch off for a moment and it costs them thay second goal.
Unknown editor edited January 22, 2025 10:26
It's a foul, but if Elliot stays on his feet and defends instead of going down when he doesn't have to then there's no goal. Should know by now you can't rely on the refs.