(---)
That's more than a slight overreaction. Under Ricky we made the finals three years in a row (the only team to do this during his time as coach) and we played some pretty damn entertaining football to get there. It wasn't slick Roarcelona style passing and possession but it involved getting the ball into the box as much as possible which while low percentage, is fun to watch, particularly for neutrals.
And then there was of course Ernie's second season. Top of the table for three weeks towards the end of the season until injuries and suspensions took their toll on a squad with too little depth. What a fudgeing ride that was, much better than what we've had with Rudan so far. I honestly have no idea where I'm going with this but you are normally so contrary to what everyone else is posting I thought I'd chime in with some pessimistic disagreements of my own.
I hope where you're going with this is what at least some of us understand. We cannot employ a mediocre coach, let alone a poor coach, and survive as a club, unlike the other 9 clubs. Ricki, Ernie, and now Rudan showed us how well we can play with the right personnel, depth, coaching and support, and how it would translate into our long term viability. Rudan's term is only one part of that picture, but he is/was not the answer to everything.