Posted April 30, 2017 01:20
· last edited April 30, 2017 01:50
with the VAR did the right decisions happen finally?
Looked to me in that game that they did.
First one could have gone either way IMO but I don't know how refs are told to interpret that law these days. Defender might have made it close enough for a desperate lunge which might have made the attacker shoot worse even if he didn't reach the ball, but I know the rule about interfering with play in an offside position is pretty narrowly interpreted. Second one was legit. The one vs us was wrong. So of the 3 calls so far, I call it 1.5 correct. They may as well flip a coin at this rate.