Posted October 27, 2018 15:34 · last edited October 27, 2018 15:47
Beath has explained that it was given for the offside.
Given the player in an offside position clearly affected play by impending the defender, even if not a foul, it's maybe a correct decision.
Beath has explained that it was given for the offside, the player in an offside position clearly effected play by impending the defender (the ref agrees it wasn't a foul).
Beath has explained that it was given for the offside, the player in an offside position clearly effected play by impending the defender (the ref agrees it wasn't a foul).
Commentators and viewers too quick to jump to the conclusion it's a howler. Correct decision was reached, but still, ditch VAR.