Appiah without the pace
6.8K
·
19K
·
about 17 years

Brockie didn't play most of the season.

Marquee
970
·
6.5K
·
almost 12 years

player and agent -

First Team Squad
500
·
1.9K
·
over 17 years

The only player who you could drop is McGlinchey. McGlinchey doesn't offer the goal scoring of his two attacking partners and doesn't even seem to be getting himself into those positions. I wouldn't drop him because the other options aren't better right now but he should be the one for the chop.

Legend
3.7K
·
15K
·
over 17 years

Dropping Burns is a ridiculous suggestion. He's unstoppable right now. Was only the finishing that was poor. 

I wouldn't change our lineup at all, just keep up the shooting practice, and some extra set piece sessions please.

Phoenix Academy
56
·
230
·
almost 10 years

Marto wrote:

I think we're stating to realise how big a loss Brockie is.  We all know he's a confidence player, scores two for us in last game and now's on a roll in SA.

Big call here but I think Burns should be dropped.  He's been worked out by other teams.  

Force him wide and don't jump in, he'll run out wide while he very in-often plays the early ball/pass as shown today.  

I wonder if the Chinese attention has put him off his game as happened to Lockhead when he trialed at Middlesbrough.

a

Burns work rate is outstanding. He has put the ball on Roy's foot half a dozen times this season.  The media love Carrusca but outside of him Burns has been the MVP and is creating as much as he shooting. 

Cock
2.7K
·
16K
·
about 15 years

I agree that McGlinchey is not showing the form he is known for.

I look at the shape of the team and tend to think that Roly is playing the position that McGlinchey is accustomed to playing over the course of his career and had performed well at. Both of those players seems to be below par at the moment. Perhaps a change for both of those 2 (and that could be positional or swapped out) may help? I don't the answer, just a suggestion.

When you consider that Krishna and Burns play high and wide with the permission to roam, Roly is in behind them and you have A-Rod whom presses forward more than Lia did, throw in McGlinchey too, I can kinda see why we get caught on counters sometimes in that we have a boat load of attacking players. Now we are questioning the form of those players. As a question, do you drag one of those non performers (and lets use McGlinchey as the example only in this case) for someone more defensive minded (and the obvious one is Lia) which may free up more room for our attacking players? We tend on occasions to have too many in each others way.

Personally, I would not actually change anything and more adding conversation for the sake of it.

valeo
·
Legend
4.7K
·
18K
·
over 17 years

Burns might not be scoring but I think he's still playing decent; he set up quite a few chances in that game (including the first goal) by simply beating his man down the outside.

To me, he's reverted back to the player he was before he came to us. That is, more a winger who is comfortable setting up chances than an out-and-out forward.

Chant Savant
2.5K
·
12K
·
over 17 years

Back to Joel Griffiths if I may.

Had a think about this over the weekend and it pains me to say but I cant see him actually being a negative for the team, regardless of how many matches he starts in the next few months.

The reason I say this is that occurred to me that he cant be coming here for the money as (in theory) he will already have been payed out his contract when his employment termination came through at Newcastle. 

As long as he knows his role in the squad then I think he will provide us with something extra. 

Even if I think he is a cod, he would be a Phoenix cod.

Now, if you excuse me I think I am about to vomit! :-)

Cock
2.7K
·
16K
·
about 15 years

C-Diddy wrote:

Back to Joel Griffiths if I may.

Had a think about this over the weekend and it pains me to say but I cant see him actually being a negative for the team, regardless of how many matches he starts in the next few months.

The reason I say this is that occurred to me that he cant be coming here for the money as (in theory) he will already have been payed out his contract when his employment termination came through at Newcastle. 

As long as he knows his role in the squad then I think he will provide us with something extra. 

Even if I think he is a cod, he would be a Phoenix cod.

Now, if you excuse me I think I am about to vomit! :-)

While you are there, press flush with your head in the bowl :o)
Cock
2.7K
·
16K
·
about 15 years

That would be a pretty loud indicator.......

Opinion Privileges revoked
5.2K
·
10K
·
almost 15 years

Ryan54 wrote:

The only player who you could drop is McGlinchey.

Remember how desperate we were to get him off the Salties?!? I think we have hard evidence that one star does not make a winning team (cf. KFCarlos).

Opinion Privileges revoked
5.2K
·
10K
·
almost 15 years
Marquee
1.4K
·
5.3K
·
about 17 years

valeo wrote:

Burns might not be scoring but I think he's still playing decent; he set up quite a few chances in that game (including the first goal) by simply beating his man down the outside.

To me, he's reverted back to the player he was before he came to us. That is, more a winger who is comfortable setting up chances than an out-and-out forward.

just feel teams are sitting deeper, doesn't help when we have conceded early, and being forced wider to get space.
Early retirement
3.2K
·
34K
·
over 17 years

This.  I think in all three games if we had scored first we'd have dealt out a pasting as they pushed to find goals.

Makes our incompetent set pieces much more of a problem.

First Team Squad
500
·
1.9K
·
over 17 years

valeo wrote:

Burns might not be scoring but I think he's still playing decent; he set up quite a few chances in that game (including the first goal) by simply beating his man down the outside.

To me, he's reverted back to the player he was before he came to us. That is, more a winger who is comfortable setting up chances than an out-and-out forward.

That's great and all but we need Burns to do a lot more than be the player he was before he came to us. Burns has propelled us to the top by advancing his game. If Burns isn't going to score goals then Krishna is our only goal scorer in the starting XI. I personally think Burns will still score goals but that is what we need from him. If he can't do it then Griffiths will need to come into the team (probably for McGlinchey).

First Team Squad
330
·
1.7K
·
almost 12 years

Apparently Perth have made Griffiths an offer.

LG
Legend
5.9K
·
24K
·
about 17 years

well we scored from a corner yesterday and we scored from a free kick. Two more bad omens put to rest.

tradition and history
1.5K
·
9.9K
·
over 17 years

Jeff Vader wrote:

I agree that McGlinchey is not showing the form he is known for.

I look at the shape of the team and tend to think that Roly is playing the position that McGlinchey is accustomed to playing over the course of his career and had performed well at. Both of those players seems to be below par at the moment. Perhaps a change for both of those 2 (and that could be positional or swapped out) may help? I don't the answer, just a suggestion.

When you consider that Krishna and Burns play high and wide with the permission to roam, Roly is in behind them and you have A-Rod whom presses forward more than Lia did, throw in McGlinchey too, I can kinda see why we get caught on counters sometimes in that we have a boat load of attacking players. Now we are questioning the form of those players. As a question, do you drag one of those non performers (and lets use McGlinchey as the example only in this case) for someone more defensive minded (and the obvious one is Lia) which may free up more room for our attacking players? We tend on occasions to have too many in each others way.

Personally, I would not actually change anything and more adding conversation for the sake of it.

Have been waiting for someone to mention that (for me anyway) that Mac is not a  natural striker  and his best position is in the midfield setting up goals. With what we have I guess he is the only one to play there.

Cock
2.7K
·
16K
·
about 15 years

I think Ernie is trying to use McGlinchey similar to the manner in which he used KFC Carlos at Melbourne. Problem is that no one is going to defend McGlinchey on the shot cause he takes none.

valeo
·
Legend
4.7K
·
18K
·
over 17 years

Leggy wrote:

Jeff Vader wrote:

I agree that McGlinchey is not showing the form he is known for.

I look at the shape of the team and tend to think that Roly is playing the position that McGlinchey is accustomed to playing over the course of his career and had performed well at. Both of those players seems to be below par at the moment. Perhaps a change for both of those 2 (and that could be positional or swapped out) may help? I don't the answer, just a suggestion.

When you consider that Krishna and Burns play high and wide with the permission to roam, Roly is in behind them and you have A-Rod whom presses forward more than Lia did, throw in McGlinchey too, I can kinda see why we get caught on counters sometimes in that we have a boat load of attacking players. Now we are questioning the form of those players. As a question, do you drag one of those non performers (and lets use McGlinchey as the example only in this case) for someone more defensive minded (and the obvious one is Lia) which may free up more room for our attacking players? We tend on occasions to have too many in each others way.

Personally, I would not actually change anything and more adding conversation for the sake of it.

Have been waiting for someone to mention that (for me anyway) that Mac is not a  natural striker  and his best position is in the midfield setting up goals. With what we have I guess he is the only one to play there.

He might be listed on the teamsheet as a striker, but he isn't really playing as one; seems to drop in behind Burns and Krishna most of the time.

I do think him and Roly sometimes seem to get in each others way.

Early retirement
3.2K
·
34K
·
over 17 years

Sackofspuds wrote:

Apparently Perth have made Griffiths an offer.


Good fit.

valeo
·
Legend
4.7K
·
18K
·
over 17 years

On one hand I think we need another striking option off the bench, especially because Boyd has been frozen out for whatever reason.

On the other hand, it's a 35-year-old J.Griffiths.

I'd rather us sign an inanimate carbon rod.

Starting XI
680
·
3.6K
·
almost 15 years

valeo wrote:

On one hand I think we need another striking option off the bench, especially because Boyd has been frozen out for whatever reason.

On the other hand, it's a 35-year-old J.Griffiths.

I'd rather us sign an inanimate carbon rod.

Surely Apiah becomes that option

Marquee
1.7K
·
7.5K
·
over 17 years

Doloras wrote:

Ryan54 wrote:

The only player who you could drop is McGlinchey.

Remember how desperate we were to get him off the Salties?!? I think we have hard evidence that one star does not make a winning team (cf. KFCarlos).

He's going through a quiet patch.  He is a quality player and will come right.

One in a million
4.4K
·
9.7K
·
over 17 years

aitkenmike wrote:

Doloras wrote:

Ryan54 wrote:

The only player who you could drop is McGlinchey.

Remember how desperate we were to get him off the Salties?!? I think we have hard evidence that one star does not make a winning team (cf. KFCarlos).

He's going through a quiet patch.  He is a quality player and will come right.

Hi did put through several excellent passes that might have turned into assists on another day

chemi
·
Trialist
39
·
120
·
over 12 years

James Gardiner ‏@JamesGardiner42

Former @NewcastleJetsFC striker Joel Griffiths set to resurrect A-league career at @WgtnPhoenixFC

8:53 PM - 23 Feb 2015


James is a journalist at the Newcastle Herald (local reliable paper), although he doesn't promise that the deal is done...

WeeNix
120
·
570
·
almost 17 years
Not from Piney, not confirmed.
Marquee
3.5K
·
6.8K
·
about 17 years

Confirmed on stuff....

Marquee
2.1K
·
6.4K
·
almost 15 years

Standby for angry mob with pitchforks and burning torches , led by News descending upon Newtown Park!

Marquee
420
·
6.3K
·
over 17 years

Haha hilarious! Hope he bangs them in for us. And scores lots of goals.

Marquee
5.3K
·
9.5K
·
almost 13 years

New chant to the tune of the Bee Gees "Night Fever" -> "Nutpuncher"

valeo
·
Legend
4.7K
·
18K
·
over 17 years

Meh; hes now a Phoenix player so will support him until he leaves. Once he leaves, he will again be a nut punching cod.

Can someone please send out a search party for Hard News in case he plans on jumping off any cliffs.

Cock
2.7K
·
16K
·
about 15 years

Griffiths scores the winning goal in the GF = rock & hard place.

Opinion Privileges revoked
5.2K
·
10K
·
almost 15 years

New chant to the tune of the Bee Gees "Night Fever" -> "Nutpuncher"

a.k.a AJ13
520
·
1.5K
·
almost 15 years

Lonegunmen wrote:

well we scored from a corner yesterday and we scored from a free kick. Two more bad omens put to rest.

Did we?

Ah wait... we did !

First Team Squad
160
·
1.8K
·
almost 17 years

Cosimo wrote:

Haha hilarious! Hope he bangs them in for us. And scores lots of goals.

It really is funny - the silence is deafening. The Mars Attack movie comes to mind, heads exploding all across Wellington. 

In case there's any lingering doubt about the veracity of the transfer he was having a coffee with Durante this morning.

He gives us a option we don't currently have to change our set up up front. A front 3 of Burns, Krishna and Griffiths - sounds good to me. Also means McGlinchy can play in a position that better suits him.

Marquee
3.8K
·
5.9K
·
over 17 years

Memory is fading but wasn't so much as a nut punch but more a fanny touch or has my memory completely failed me  At least it's not Burns

WeeNix
40
·
600
·
about 14 years

Heard Karmichael Hunt may be looking for a job. The Sackwhacker and the Snifter

Phoenix Academy
10
·
370
·
about 17 years

Anyone heard about a possible Boyd move to Portugal?  Credence or bollocks?

You’ll need an account to join the conversation!

Sign in Sign up

You need to be logged in to do that!