Post history

History for Tegal

2015/16 Season Memberships

Back to topic

Current version

Posted October 31, 2015 05:02 · last edited October 31, 2015 05:03

ballane wrote:

RR wrote:

Tegal wrote:

should have bought in pet memberships like other club has done. That is why these metrics are bullshark. They encourage inflating figures artificially and don't actually mean anything when it comes to how well a club is actually performing. 

The pet memberships for Sydney are just for show, they are not included in figures

Yeah but they are as relative as Yakcalls for his baby. Because inflating the figures is exactly what we are doing here but it seems to float the FFAs boat.

Yep we are doing it because it is what the FFA measures clubs on. Which is fair enough, if the FFA set targets/metrics you have to try meet those targets - no matter how pointless they otherwise are. 

The metrics are arbitrary and stupid though. 

Previous versions

3 versions
Tegal edited October 31, 2015 05:03
ballane wrote:
RR wrote:
Tegal wrote:

should have bought in pet memberships like other club has done. That is why these metrics are bullshark. They encourage inflating figures artificially and don't actually mean anything when it comes to how well a club is actually performing. 

The pet memberships for Sydney are just for show, they are not included in figures
Yeah but they are as relative as Yakcalls for his baby. Because inflating the figures is exactly what we are doing here but it seems to float the FFAs boat.

Yep we are doing it because it is what the FFA measures clubs on. Which is fair enough, if the FFA set targets you have to try meet those targets - no matter how pointless they otherwise are. 

The measures are arbitrary and stupid though. 

Tegal edited October 31, 2015 05:03
ballane wrote:
RR wrote:
Tegal wrote:

should have bought in pet memberships like other club has done. That is why these metrics are bullshark. They encourage inflating figures artificially and don't actually mean anything when it comes to how well a club is actually performing. 

The pet memberships for Sydney are just for show, they are not included in figures
Yeah but they are as relative as Yakcalls for his baby. Because inflating the figures is exactly what we are doing here but it seems to float the FFAs boat.

Yep we are doing it because it is what the FFA measures clubs on. Which is fair enough, if the FFA set targets you have to try meet those targets - no matter how pointless they otherwise are. 

The measures are arbitrary and stupid. 

Tegal edited October 31, 2015 05:02
ballane wrote:
RR wrote:
Tegal wrote:

should have bought in pet memberships like other club has done. That is why these metrics are bullshark. They encourage inflating figures artificially and don't actually mean anything when it comes to how well a club is actually performing. 

The pet memberships for Sydney are just for show, they are not included in figures
Yeah but they are as relative as Yakcalls for his baby. Because inflating the figures is exactly what we are doing here but it seems to float the FFAs boat.

Yep we are doing it because it is what the FFA measures clubs on. Which is fair enough, if the FFA set targets you have to try meet those targets - no matter how pointless they otherwise are. 

The measures are arbitrary and stupid. But given they are what they are, the clubs reaction m