Posted November 09, 2025 00:05
· last edited November 09, 2025 00:05
AucklandPhoenix
You do realise that Chris Wood does this a thousand times a season?Fenix
martinb
Fenix
Whatever the law currently says,IMO crosgrove should not be allowed to stand in an offside position from where he attacks. He's clearly seeking an advantage.
Accepted part of a CFs game though internationally. He’s okay as long as he’s not in the box interfering with the keepers eyeline I think.
Maybe. But watching Cosgroves actions in the replay,I think it's farcical that that isn't deemed offside.
No I don't,and that's not the point.
My point is that in the circumstances of the goal yesterday, I think that should be deemed offside.
Now, if the purpose of the current law is to open play up,then fair enough, and it is surely madness to play such a high line which can be so easily undone.
Previous versions
1 version
Unknown editoredited November 09, 2025 00:05
AucklandPhoenix
You do realise that Chris Wood does this a thousand times a season?Fenix
martinb
Fenix
Whatever the law currently says,IMO crosgrove should not be allowed to stand in an offside position from where he attacks. He's clearly seeking an advantage.
Accepted part of a CFs game though internationally. He’s okay as long as he’s not in the box interfering with the keepers eyeline I think.
Maybe. But watching Cosgroves actions in the replay,I think it's farcical that that isn't deemed offside.
No I don't,and that's not the point. My point is that in the circumstances of the goal yesterday, I think that should be deemed offside.
Now, if the purpose of the current law is to open play up,then fair enough, and it is surely madness to play such a high line which can be so easily undone.