Posted December 07, 2025 02:28
· last edited December 07, 2025 05:59
That is utterly wrong, the replay clearly showed there was no contact yet the attacker made a meal of nothing, therefore deserving the penalty for simulation. not much argument from him either I recall.Mainland FC
We had the potential penalty appeal by Adelaide scrubbed out for simulation last week; you could argue either that player wasn't as good at milking a penalty as Cosgrove, or it is a difference (inconsistence) between the VAR at one game vs another.
Previous versions
1 version
Unknown editoredited December 07, 2025 05:59
That is utterly wrong, the replay clearly showed there was no contact yet thebattacker made a meal of nothing, therefore deservingbthe penalty for simulation. not muchbargument from him either I recall.Mainland FC
We had the potential penalty appeal by Adelaide scrubbed out for simulation last week; you could argue either that player wasn't as good at milking a penalty as Cosgrove, or it is a difference (inconsistence) between the VAR at one game vs another.