Greenie will have them sorted for next week. He can prove he's up to it with a good run.
He doesn't have the qualifications though. FFA require it not the nix.
Another silly rule/stipulation that the FFA have set. Surely a club can decide who they wish to appoint as coach - shouldnt matter if they have a piece of paper saying they are qualified. There is a simple way around it, appoint someone with the right piece of paper and appoint whoever we wish as their assistant - although the appointed coach is just a puppet to the assistant
Not sure I would agree with all of that. The point is that very early on FFA decided to establish a minimum coaching qualification so that all clubs would be coached at certain comparable level. This was to bring a minimum standard and in theory is very commendable. Therefore, one club saying "but we do not agree" should not be able get exempted because Ramon is already a good coach.
I am however 100% with you on the question what the minimum level should be. You could argue that guys like Ramon (or many others mentioned here) are a real proof you do not need a top UEFA Pro diploma to be a very decent coach. Also, it is a joke to say that coaches who qualified in Australia do not have to do a UEFA Pro. It appears a local diploma is fine, but if you're an English coach then oh no, an UK equivalent to Aussie diploma is not enough? That is a closed-shop joke.