I dunno. Wouldn't a capo be even more elitist?
Of course. But it's not a democracy, if you want it to work.
Egalitarianism leads to shambles, been proven time and again.
Yep though as I said yesterday, given this is the route we have gone down, I don't think we can suddenly switch to capos etc.
It's quite hard for people to accept something else once democracy is the norm.
I think what we therefore need to do is be more active about encouraging more people to get involved.
The result of the way we do things is bit more of a fluctuation in our fever zone 'performance' - when we are good, I think we are better than under a capo...but when we are bad, we are really quite bad. I think we are moving in the right direction to at least flatten that out a bit, and yesterday was a solid start.