<snip>
Subjective voting may not be a true reflection on who was in fact man of the match. In previous voting fans would vote for who they liked rather than using hard cold stats
I think it was quite apparent that Paston was not very well liked around here before the Brisbane game, and if he was liked, there was certainly not enough people to give him more than half the votes. Since he has such a clear lead, I would say that it is statistically probably that he is considered the man of the match for the game.
you may well be right patrick, was referring to the old man of the match voting when votes when to all and sundry depending on the whim of the individual voting
yeah I think the voting this season has been very reflective of how well players have been performing on the pitch. Although that is my subjective opinion though... so who knows.